translation_id: net-engnet

book_id: JER

label: NET translator note

text: Heb “Oracle of the Lord .”


text: Heb “who survived the sword.” sn This refers to the remnant of northern Israel who had not been killed when Assyria conquered Israel in 722 b.c. or who had not died in exile. References to Samaria in v. 5 and to Ephraim in vv. 6, 9 make clear that northern Israel is in view here.


text: Or “The people of Israel who survived the onslaughts of Egypt and Amalek found favor in the wilderness as they journeyed to find rest. At that time long ago the Lord manifested himself to them. He said, ‘I have…That is why I have drawn you to myself through my unfailing kindness.’” For the basis for each of these translations see the translator’s note. There is debate whether the reference here is to God’s preservation of Israel during their wandering in the Sinai desert or his promise to protect and preserve them on their return through the Arabian desert on the way back from Assyria and Babylon (see e.g., Isa 42:14-16; 43:16-21 ; Jer 16:14-15; 23:7-8 ). The only finite verbs in vv. 2-3 a before the introduction of the quote are perfects which can denote either a past act or a future act viewed as certain of fulfillment (the prophetic perfect; see GKC 312-13 §106. n and see examples in Jer 11:16; 13:17; 25:14; 28:4 ). The phrase at the beginning of v. 3 can either refer to temporal (cf. BDB 935 s.v. רָחוֹק 2.b and Isa 22:11 ) or spatial distance (cf. BDB 935 s.v. רָחוֹק 2.a[2] and Isa 5:29; 59:14 ). The verb in the final clause in v. 3 can refer to either the continuance of God’s love as in Ps 36:10 (cf. BDB 604 s.v. מָשַׁךְ Qal.5) or drawing someone to him in electing, caring love as in Hos 11:4 (cf. BDB 604 s.v. מָשַׁךְ Qal.1). The translation has opted for the prophetic reference to future deliverance because of the preceding context, the use of מֵרָחוֹק ( merakhoq ) to refer to the far off land of exile in Jer 30:10; 46:27; 51:50 , and the reference to survivors from the sword being called on to remember the Lord in that far off land in 51:50 .


text: Heb “Virgin Israel.” sn For the significance of this metaphor see the note on Jer 14:17 . Here the emphasis appears on his special love and care for his people and the hint (further developed in vv. 21-22 ) that, though guilty of sin, he considers them like an innocent young virgin.


text: For location see Map2-B1 ; Map4-D3 ; Map5-E2 ; Map6-A4 ; Map7-C1 .


text: See the translator’s notes on 30:5, 12 .


text: Heb “for the head/chief of the nations.” See BDB 911 s.v. רֹאשׁ 3.c and compare usage in Ps 18:44 referring to David as the “chief” or “foremost ruler” of the nations.


text: It is unclear who the addressees of the masculine plural imperatives are in this verse. Possibly they are the implied exiles who are viewed as in the process of returning and praying for their fellow countrymen.


label: NET textual note

text: Or “The Lord will rescue his people. He will deliver those of Israel who remain alive.” The translation used in the text follows the Hebrew: “Rescue your people, O Lord , the remnant of Israel.” The alternate translation which is preferred by several modern English versions (e.g., REB, TEV) and a majority of modern commentaries (see, e.g., J. A. Thompson, Jeremiah [NICOT], 569; J. Bright, Jeremiah [AB], 273, n. s-s) follows the reading of the Greek version and the Aramaic Targum and appears more appropriate to the context of praise presupposed by the preceding imperatives. The difference in the two readings are the omission of one vowel letter and the confusion of a final ךְ ( kaf ) and a וֹ ( holem-vav ) which are very similar in form. (The Greek presupposes הוֹשִׁיעַ יְהוָה אֶת־עַמּוֹ [ hoshi ’ a yÿhvah ’ et- ’ ammo ] for the Hebrew הוֹשַׁע יְהוָה אֶת־עַמְּךְ [ hosha ’ yÿhvah ’ et- ’ ammÿkh ].) The key to a decision here is the shift from the verbs of praise to the imperative “say” which introduces the quotation; there is a shift from praise to petition. The shift in mood is not uncommon, occurring, for example, in Ps 118:25 and 126:4 ; it is the shift in mood between praise for what has begun to petition for what is further hoped for. It is easier to explain the origin contextually of the Greek and Targum than it is the Hebrew text, thus the Greek and Targum are probably a secondary smoothing of the text (this is the decision of the D. Barthélemy, ed., Preliminary and Interim Report on the Hebrew Old Testament Text Project , 4:263). The mood of prayer also shows up in v. 9 and again in vv. 17-18 .


text: The words “And I will reply” are not in the text but the words vv. 8-9 appear to be the answer to the petition at the end of v. 7 . These words are supplied in the translation for clarity.


text: Heb “They will come with weeping; I will bring them with supplication.” The ideas of contrition and repentance are implicit from the context (cf. vv. 18-19 ) and are supplied for clarity.


text: Heb “from the hand/power of the one too strong for him.”


text: Reading a Qal perfect from the root II נָהַר ( nahar ; so KBL 509 s.v. and HALOT 639 s.v.) rather than I נָהַר (so BDB 625 s.v.).


text: Heb “Oracle of the Lord .” This phrase has been brought up to the beginning of v. 13 from the end of v. 14 to introduce the transition from third person description by Jeremiah to first person address by the Lord .


text: The translation follows the reading of the LXX (Greek version). The Hebrew reads “will dance and be glad, young men and old men together.” The Greek version presupposes a Qal imperfect of a rare verb ( יַחְדּוּ [ yakhdu ] from the verb חָדָה [ khadah ]; see BDB 292 s.v. II חָדָה Qal) as opposed to the Hebrew text which reads a common adverb יַחְדָּו ( yakhdav ). The consonantal text is the same but the vocalization is different. There are no other examples of the syntax of the adverb used this way (i.e., of a compound subject added to a third subject) and the vocalization of the Hebrew text can be explained on the basis of a scribe misvocalizing the text based on his greater familiarity with the adverb.


text: Heb “I will satiate the priests with fat.” However, the word translated “fat” refers literally to the fat ashes of the sacrifices (see Lev 1:16; 4:2 and cf. BDB 206 s.v. דֶּשֶׁן 2. The word is used more abstractly for “abundance” or “rich food” (see Job 36:16 and BDB 206 s.v. דֶּשֶׁן 1). The people and the priests were prohibited from eating the fat ( Lev 7:23-24 ).


text: Or “gone into exile” (cf. v. 16 ), though some English versions take this as meaning “dead” (e.g., NCV, CEV, NLT), presumably in light of Matt 2:18 .


text: The words “to her” are not in the text but are implicit from the context. They are supplied in the translation for clarity.


text: Heb “Refrain your voice from crying and your eyes from tears.”


text: Heb “your work.” Contextually her “work” refers to her weeping and refusing to be comforted, that is, signs of genuine repentance (v. 15 ).


text: Heb “Oracle of the Lord .”


text: For this nuance for the Hebrew word אַחֲרִית (’ akharit ) see BDB 31 s.v. אַחֲרִית d and compare usage in Pss 37:38; 109:13 . Others translate “your future” but the “future” lies with the return of her descendants, her posterity.


text: The use of “indeed” is intended to reflect the infinitive absolute which precedes the verb for emphasis (see IBHS 585-86 §35.3.1f).


text: Heb “Ephraim.” See the study note on 31:9 . The more familiar term is used, the term “people” added to it, and plural pronouns used throughout the verse to aid in understanding.


text: Heb “like an untrained calf.” The metaphor is that of a calf who has never been broken to bear the yoke (cf. Hos 4:16; 10:11 ). sn Jer 2:20; 5:5 already referred to Israel’s refusal to bear the yoke of loyalty and obedience to the Lord ’s demands. Here Israel expresses that she has learned from the discipline of exile and is ready to bear his yoke.


text: The verb here is from the same root as the preceding and is probably an example of the “tolerative Niphal,” i.e., “I let myself be disciplined/I responded to it.” See IBHS 389-90 §23.4g and note the translation of some of the examples there, especially Isa 19:22; 65:1 .


text: Heb “Bring me back in order that I may come back.” For the use of the plural pronouns see the marginal note at the beginning of the verse. The verb “bring back” and “come back” are from the same root in two different verbal stems and in the context express the idea of spiritual repentance and restoration of relationship not physical return to the land. (See BDB 999 s.v. שׁוּב Hiph.2.a for the first verb and 997 s.v. Qal.6.c for the second.) For the use of the cohortative to express purpose after the imperative see GKC 320 §108. d or IBHS 575 §34.5.2b. sn There is a wordplay on several different nuances of the same Hebrew verb in vv. 16-19 . The Hebrew verb shub refers both to their turning away from God (v. 19 ) and to their turning back to him (v. 18 ). It is also the word that is used for their return to their homeland (vv. 16-17 ).


text: For this meaning of the verb see HAL 374 s.v. יָדַע Nif 5 or W. L. Holladay, Concise Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon , 129. REB translates “Now that I am submissive” relating the verb to a second root meaning “be submissive.” (See HALOT 375 s.v. II יָדַע and J. Barr, Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old Testament , 19-21, for evidence for this verb. Other passages cited with this nuance are Judg 8:16 ; Prov 10:9 ; Job 20:20 .)


text: Heb “I struck my thigh.” This was a gesture of grief and anguish (cf. Ezek 21:12 [ 21:17 HT]). The modern equivalent is “to beat the breast.”


text: Heb “because I bear the reproach of my youth.” For the plural referents see the note at the beginning of v. 18 . sn The expression the disgraceful things we did in our earlier history refers to the disgrace that accompanied the sins that Israel did in her earlier years before she learned the painful lesson of submission to the Lord through the discipline of exile. For earlier references to the sins of her youth (i.e., in her earlier years as a nation) see 3:24-25; 22:21 and see also 32:29 . At the time that these verses were written, neither northern Israel or Judah had expressed the kind of contrition voiced in vv. 18-19 . As one commentator notes, the words here are both prophetic and instructive.


text: Heb “Is Ephraim a dear son to me or a child of delight?” For the substitution of Israel for Ephraim and the plural pronouns for the singular see the note on v. 18 . According to BDB 210 s.v. הֲ 1.c the question is rhetorical having the force of an impassioned affirmation. See 1 Sam 2:27 ; Job 41:9 ( 41:1 HT) for parallel usage.


text: Heb “my stomach churns for him.” The parallelism shows that this refers to pity or compassion.


text: The words “I will say” are not in the text. They are supplied in the translation to mark the transition from the address about Israel in a response to Rachel’s weeping (vv. 15-20 ) to a direct address to Israel which is essentially the answer to Israel’s prayer of penitence (cf. G. L. Keown, P. J. Scalise, T. G. Smothers, Jeremiah 26-52 [WBC], 121.) sn The Lord here invites Israel to stop dilly-dallying and prepare themselves to return because he is prepared to do something new and miraculous.


text: Heb “Virgin Israel.” For the significance see the study note on 31:3 .


text: Heb “Set your mind to the highway, the way which you went.” The phrase “the way you went” has been translated “the road you took when you were carried off” to help the reader see the reference to the exile implicit in the context. The verb “which you went” is another example of the old second feminine singular which the Masoretes typically revocalize ( Kethib הָלָכְתִּי [ halakhti ]; Qere הָלָכְתְּ [ halakht ]). The vocative has been supplied in the translation at the beginning to help make the transition from third person reference to Ephraim/Israel in the preceding to second person in the following and to identify the referent of the imperatives. Likewise, this line has been moved to the front to show that the reference to setting up sign posts and landmarks is not literal but figurative, referring to making a mental note of the way they took when carried off so that they can easily find their way back. Lines three and four in the Hebrew text read, “Set up sign posts for yourself; set up guideposts/landmarks for yourself.” The word translated “telltale signs marking the way” occurs only here. Though its etymology and precise meaning are unknown, all the lexicons agree in translating it as “sign post” or something similar based on the parallelism.


text: The translation “dilly-dally” is suggested by J. Bright, Jeremiah (AB), 276. The verb occurs only here in this stem (the Hitpael) and only one other time in any other stem (the Qal in Song 5:6 ). The dictionaries define it as “to turn this way and that” (cf., e.g., BDB 330 s.v. חָמַק Hithp.). In the context it refers to turning this way and that looking for the way back.


text: Heb “For the Lord will create.” The person has been shifted to avoid the possible confusion for some readers of a third person reference to the Lord in what has otherwise been a first person address. The verb “will create” is another one of the many examples of the prophetic perfect that have been seen in the book of Jeremiah. For the significance of the verb “create” here see the study note on “bring about something new.”


text: The meaning of this last line is uncertain. The translation has taken it as proverbial for something new and unique. For a fairly complete discussion of most of the options see C. Feinberg, “Jeremiah,” EBC 6:571. For the nuance of “protecting” for the verb here see BDB 686 s.v. סָבַב Po‘ 1 and compare the usage in Deut 32:10 .


text: Heb “Yahweh of armies, the God of Israel.” See 7:3 and the study note of 2:19 for the rendering of this title and an explanation of its significance.


text: Heb “They [i.e., people (the indefinite plural, GKC 460 §144. g )] will again say in the land of Judah and in its cities when I restore their fortunes.” For the meaning of the idiom “to restore the fortunes” see the translator’s note on 29:14 .


text: The words “of Jerusalem” are not in the text but it is implicit in the titles that follow. They have been supplied in the translation for clarity to aid in identifying the referent. map For location see Map5-B1 ; Map6-F3 ; Map7-E2 ; Map8-F2 ; Map10-B3 ; JP1-F4 ; JP2-F4 ; JP3-F4 ; JP4-F4 .


text: The translation “those who move about with their flocks” is based on an emendation of the Hebrew text which reads a third plural Qal perfect ( נָסְעוּ , nos ’ u ) to a masculine plural Qal participle in the construct ( נֹסְעֵי , nosÿ ’ e ) as suggested in the BHS fn. For the use of the construct participle before a noun with a preposition see GKC 421 §130. a . It is generally agreed that three classes of people are referred to here, townspeople, farmers, and shepherds. But the syntax of the Hebrew sentence is a little awkward: “And they [i.e., “people” (the indefinite plural, GKC 460 §144. g )] will live in it, Judah and all its cities [an apposition of nearer definition (GKC 425-26 §131. n )], [along with] farmers and those who move about with their flocks.” The first line refers awkwardly to the townspeople and the other two classes are added asyndetically (i.e., without the conjunction “and”).


text: The verbs here again emphasize that the actions are as good as done (i.e., they are prophetic perfects; cf. GKC 312-13 §106. n ). sn For the concept here compare Jer 31:12 where the promise was applied to northern Israel. This represents the reversal of the conditions that would characterize the exiles according to the covenant curse of Deut 28:65-67 .


text: Or “When I, Jeremiah, heard this, I woke up and looked around. My sleep had been very pleasant.” The text is somewhat enigmatic. It has often been explained as an indication that Jeremiah had received this communication ( 30:3 –31:26) while in a prophetic trance (compare Dan 10:9 ). However, there is no other indication that this is a vision or a vision report. G. L. Keown, P. J. Scalise, and T. G. Smothers ( Jeremiah 26-52 [WBC], 124, 128-29) suggest that this is a speech of the restored (and refreshed) exiles like that which is formally introduced in v. 23 . This speech, however, is not formally introduced. This interpretation is also reflected in TEV, CEV and is accepted here as fitting the context better and demanding less presuppositions. The Hebrew text reads literally, “Upon this I awoke and looked and my sleep was sweet to me.” Keown, Scalise, and Smothers have the best discussion of these two options as well as several other options.


text: Heb “Behold days are coming!” The particle “Behold” is probably used here to emphasize the reality of a fact. See the translator’s note on 1:6 . sn This same expression is found in the introduction to the Book of Consolation ( Jer 30:1-3 ) and in the introduction to the promise of a new covenant (or covenant; 31:31 ). In all three passages it is emphasized that the conditions apply to both Israel and Judah. The Lord will reverse their fortunes and restore them to their lands ( 30:3 ), increase their numbers and build them up ( 31:27-28 ), and make a new covenant with them involving forgiveness of sins ( 31:31-34 ).


text: Heb “Oracle of the Lord .”


text: Heb “Behold, the days are coming and [= when] I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of people and of animals.” For the significance of the metaphor see the study note. sn The metaphor used here presupposes that drawn in Hos 2:23 ( 2:25 HT) which is in turn based on the wordplay with Jezreel (meaning “God sows”) in Hos 2:22 . The figure is that of plant seed in the ground which produces a crop; here what are sown are the “seeds of people and animals.” For a similar picture of the repopulating of Israel and Judah see Ezek 36:10-11 . The promise here reverses the scene of devastation that Jeremiah had depicted apocalyptically and hyperbolically in Jer 4:23-29 as judgment for Judah’s sins.


text: Heb “Just as I watched over them to uproot and to tear down, to destroy and demolish, so I will watch over them to build and to plant.” The words here repeat those of 1:10 and 1:12 .


text: This word only occurs here and in the parallel passage in Ezek 18:2 in the Qal stem and in Eccl 10:10 in the Piel stem. In the latter passage it refers to the bluntness of an ax that has not been sharpened. Here the idea is of the “bluntness” of the teeth, not from having ground them down due to the bitter taste of sour grapes but to the fact that they have lost their “edge,” “bite,” or “sharpness” because they are numb from the sour taste. For this meaning for the word see W. L. Holladay, Jeremiah (Hermeneia), 2:197. sn This is a proverbial statement that is also found in Ezek 18:2 . It served to articulate the complaint that the present generation was suffering for the accrued sins of their ancestors (cf. Lam 5:7 ) and that the Lord was hence unjust ( Ezek 18:25, 29 ). However, Jeremiah had repeatedly warned his own generation that they were as guilty or even more so than their ancestors. The ancestors were indeed guilty of sin but the present generation had compounded the problem by their stubborn refusal to turn back to God despite repeated warnings from the prophets and hence God would withhold judgment no longer (cf. especially Jer 16:10-13 and compare Jer 7:24-34; 9:12-16 ( 9:11-15 HT); 11:1-13 ).


text: Or “a renewed covenant” (also in vv. 22-23 ).


text: Heb “the house of Israel and the house of Judah.”


text: The word “old” is not in the text but is implicit in the use of the word “new.” It is supplied in the translation for greater clarity.


text: Heb “fathers.” sn This refers to the Mosaic covenant which the nation entered into with God at Sinai and renewed on the plains of Moab. The primary biblical passages explicating this covenant are –24 and the book of Deuteronomy; see as well the study note on Jer 11:2 for the form this covenant took and its relation to the warnings of the prophets. The renewed document of Deuteronomy was written down and provisions made for periodic public reading and renewal of commitment to it ( Deut 31:9-13 ). Josiah had done this after the discovery of the book of the law (which was either Deuteronomy or a synopsis of it) early in the ministry of Jeremiah ( 2 Kgs 23:1-4 ; the date would be near 622 b.c. shortly after Jeremiah began prophesying in 627 [see the note on Jer 1:2 ]). But it is apparent from Jeremiah’s confrontation with Judah after that time that the commitment of the people was only superficial (cf. Jer 3:10 ). The prior history of the nations of Israel and Judah and Judah’s current practice had been one of persistent violation of this covenant despite repeated warnings of the prophets that God would punish them for that (see especially Jer 7, 11 ). Because of that, Israel had been exiled (cf., e.g., Jer 3:8 ), and now Judah was threatened with the same (cf., e.g., Jer 7:15 ). –31 look forward to a time when both Israel and Judah will be regathered, reunited, and under a new covenant which includes the same stipulations but with a different relationship (v. 32 ).


text: Heb “when I took them by the hand and led them out.”


text: Or “I was their master.” See the study note on 3:14 . sn The metaphor of Yahweh as husband and Israel as wife has been used already in and is implicit in the repeated allusions to idolatry as spiritual adultery or prostitution. The best commentary on the faithfulness of God to his “husband-like” relation is seen in the book of Hosea, especially in Hos 1-3 .


text: Heb “with the house of Israel.” All commentators agree that the term here refers to both the whole nation which was divided into the house of Israel and the house of Judah in v. 30 .


text: Heb “after those days.” Commentators are generally agreed that this refers to the return from exile and the repopulation of the land referred to in vv. 27-28 and not to something subsequent to the time mentioned in v. 30 . This is the sequencing that is also presupposed in other new covenant passages such as Deut 30:1-6 ; Ezek 11:17-20; 36:24-28 .


text: Heb “‘But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after these days:’ says the Lord , ‘I will….’” The sentence has been reworded and restructured to avoid the awkwardness of the original style.


text: Heb “in their inward parts.” The Hebrew word here refers to the seat of the thoughts, emotions, and decisions ( Jer 9:8 [ 9:7 HT]). It is essentially synonymous with “heart” in Hebrew psychological terms.


text: The words “and minds” is not in the text but is supplied in the translation to bring the English psychology more into line with the Hebrew where the “heart” is the center both of knowing/thinking/reflecting and deciding/willing. sn Two contexts are relevant for understanding this statement. First is the context of the first or old covenant which was characterized by a law written on stone tablets (e.g., Exod 32:15-16; 34:1, 28 ; Deut 4:13; 5:22; 9:10 ) or in a “book” or “scroll” ( Deut 31:9-13 ) which could be lost (cf. 2 Kgs 22:8 ), forgotten ( Hos 4:6 ), ignored ( Jer 6:19 ; Amos 4:2 ), or altered ( Jer 8:8 ). Second is the context of the repeated fault that Jeremiah has found with their stubborn ( 3:17; 7:24; 9:14; 11:8; 13:10; 16:12; 18:12; 23:17 ), uncircumcised ( 4:4; 9:26 ), and desperately wicked hearts ( 4:4; 17:9 ). Radical changes were necessary to get the people to obey the law from the heart and not just pay superficial or lip service to it ( 3:10; 12:2 ). Deut 30:1-6 ; Ezek 11:17-20; 36:24-28 speak of these radical changes. The Lord will remove the “foreskin” of their heart and give them a circumcised heart, or take away their “stony” heart and give them a new heart. With this heart they will be able to obey his laws, statutes, ordinances, and commands ( Deut 30:8 ; Ezek 11:20; 36:27 ). The new covenant does not entail a new law; it is the same law that Jeremiah has repeatedly accused them of rejecting or ignoring ( 6:19; 9:13; 16:11; 26:4; 44:10 ). What does change is their inner commitment to keep it. Jeremiah has already referred to this in Jer 24:7 and will refer to it again in Jer 32:39 .


text: Heb “teach…, saying, ‘Know the Lord .’” The indirect quote has been chosen for stylistic reasons, i.e., to better parallel the following line. sn As mentioned in the translator’s note on 9:3 ( 9:2 HT) “knowing” God in covenant contexts like this involves more than just an awareness of who he is ( 9:23 [ 9:22 HT]). It involves an acknowledgment of his sovereignty and whole hearted commitment to obedience to him. This is perhaps best seen in the parallelisms in Hos 4:1; 6:6 where “the knowledge of God” is parallel with faithfulness and steadfast love and in the context of refers to obedience to the Lord ’s commands.


text: The Hebrew particle כִּי ( ki ) that introduces this clause refers to more than just the preceding clause (i.e., that all will know the Lord ) but to all of vv. 31-34 a (See BDB 474 s.v. כִּי 3.c).


text: Heb “Yahweh of armies.” See the study note on 2:19 for this title. In the Hebrew text the verse reads: “Thus says the Lord who provides the sun for light by day, the fixed ordering of the moon and stars for light by night, who stirs up the sea and its waves roar, whose name is Yahweh of armies, ‘…’” The hymnic introduction to the quote which does not begin until v. 36 has been broken down to avoid a long awkward sentence in English. The word “said” has been translated “made a promise” to reflect the nature of the content in vv. 36-37 . The first two lines of the Hebrew poetry are a case of complex or supplementary ellipsis where the complete idea of “providing/establishing the fixed laws” is divided between the two lines (cf. E. W. Bullinger, Figures of Speech , 110-13). The necessity for recombining the ellipsis is obvious from reference to the fixed ordering in the next verse. (Some commentators prefer to delete the word as an erroneous glossing of the word in the following line (see, e.g., J. Bright, Jeremiah [AB], 277, n. y).


text: Heb “Oracle of the Lord .”


text: Heb “‘If these fixed orderings were to fail to be present before me,’ oracle of the Lord , ‘then the seed of Israel could cease from being a nation before me forever (or more literally, “all the days”).’” The sentence has been broken up to conform more to modern style. The connection has been maintained by reversing the order of condition and consequence and still retaining the condition in the second clause. For the meaning of “cease to operate” for the verb מוּשׁ ( mush ) compare the usage in Isa 54:10 ; Ps 55:11 ( 55:12 HT); Prov 17:13 where what is usually applied to persons or things is applied to abstract things like this (see HALOT 506 s.v. II מוּשׁ Qal for general usage).


text: Heb “If the heavens above could be measured or the foundations of the earth below be explored, then also I could reject all the seed of Israel for all they have done.”


text: The words “is coming” ( בָּאִים , ba ’ im ) are not in the written text ( Kethib ) but are supplied in the margin ( Qere ), in several Hebrew mss and in the versions. It is part of the idiom that also occurs in vv. 27, 31 . sn On this idiom compare vv. 27, 31 .


text: For location see Map5-B1 ; Map6-F3 ; Map7-E2 ; Map8-F2 ; Map10-B3 ; JP1-F4 ; JP2-F4 ; JP3-F4 ; JP4-F4 .


text: Heb “the city will be built to [or for] the Lord .” The words “of Jerusalem” are not in the text but are implicit from the context. They have been supplied in the translation for clarity. However, the word occurs in a first person speech so the translation has accommodated the switch in person as it has in a number of other places (compare also NIV, TEV, ICV).


text: The word “westward” is not in the text but is supplied in the translation to give some orientation. sn The Tower of Hananel is referred to in Neh 3:1; 12:39 ; Zech 14:10 . According to the directions given in it was in the northern wall, perhaps in the northeast corner, north of the temple mount. The Corner Gate is mentioned again in 2 Kgs 14:13 ; 2 Chr 25:23; 26:9 ; Zech 14:10 . It is generally agreed that it was located in the northwest corner of the city.


text: The words “west” and “southward” are not in the text but are supplied in the translation to give some orientation. sn The location of the Hill of Gareb and the place called Goah are not precisely known. However, it has been plausibly suggested from the other localities mentioned that the reference is to the hill west of the Hinnom valley mentioned in Josh 15:8 . The location of Goah is generally placed south of that near the southwest corner of the Hinnom Valley which is referred to in the next verse.


text: The translation here follows the Qere and a number of Hebrew mss in reading שְׁדֵמוֹת ( shÿdemot ) for the otherwise unknown word שְׁרֵמוֹת ( shÿremot ) exhibiting the common confusion of ר ( resh ) and ד ( dalet ). The fields of Kidron are mentioned also in 2 Kgs 23:4 as the place where Josiah burned the cult objects of Baal.


text: The words “on the east” and “north” are not in the text but are supplied in the translation to give orientation.


text: The words “will be included within this city that is” are not in the text. The text merely says that “The whole valley…will be sacred to the Lord .” These words have been supplied in the translation because they are really implicit in the description of the whole area as being included within the new city plan, not just the Hinnom and terraced fields as far as the Kidron Valley. sn The area that is here delimited is larger than any of the known boundaries of Jerusalem during the OT period. Again, this refers to the increase in population of the restored community (cf. 31:27 ).