translation_id: net-engnet

label: NET translator note

text: The word “From” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied to indicate the sender of the letter.


text: Or “presbyter.” sn The author’s self-designation, the elder , is in keeping with the reticence of the author of the Gospel of John to identify himself. This is the same self-designation used by the author of 3 John.


text: This phrase may refer to an individual or to a church (or the church at large). Some have suggested that the addressee is a Christian lady named “Electa,” but the same word in v. 13 is clearly an adjective, not a proper name. Others see the letter addressed to a Christian lady named “Kyria” (first proposed by Athanasius) or to an unnamed Christian lady. The internal evidence of 2 John clearly supports a collective reference, however. In v. 6 the addressee is mentioned using second person plural, and this is repeated in vv. 8, 10, and 12 . Only in v. 13 does the singular reappear. The uses in vv. 1 and 13 are most likely collective. Some have seen a reference to the church at large, but v. 13 , referring to “the children of your elect sister” is hard to understand if the universal church is in view. Thus the most probable explanation is that the “elect lady” is a particular local church at some distance from where the author is located. sn 2 John is being written to warn a “sister” church some distance away, referred to as an elect lady , of the missionary efforts of the secessionist false teachers (discussed in 1 John) and the dangers of welcoming them whenever they arrive.


text: The prepositional phrase ἐν ἀληθείᾳ ( en alhqeia ) in is similar to , although it is not qualified there as it is here (see ). This is not merely the equivalent of an adverb (“truly”), but is a theological statement affirming the orthodoxy of Gaius, to whom the letter is addressed. “Truth” is the author’s way of alluding to theological orthodoxy in the face of the challenge by the opponents (see 1 John 3:19 ).


label: NET textual note

text: The prepositional phrase that begins v. 2 , διὰ τὴν ἀλήθειαν ( dia thn alhqeian , “because of the truth”), is missing in a number of significant mss , among them Ψ 614 1241 1505 1739 al . However, it looks to be a simple case of homoioteleuton, for v. 1 ends with τὴν ἀλήθειαν . For some of these mss it could be an intentional omission, for the sense of the passage is largely the same without the prepositional phrase (the following adjectival participle, in this case, would simply attach itself to the previous τὴν ἀλήθειαν ). The phrase could thus have been viewed as redundant and for this reason expunged from the text. sn While truth certainly has a doctrinal aspect in this context, the following phrase that resides in us and will be with us forever suggests more than doctrine is involved. A close parallel is John 14:16-17 where Jesus promised his disciples that the Spirit (Paraclete) would be with them forever: “He remains with you and will be in you.” The “truth” the author speaks of here is a manifestation of the Spirit of Truth who is permanently with the believer.


text: “And” is not in the Greek text. It is supplied for smoothness in English.


text: Most witnesses, including some early and important ones ( א P 33 Ï sy), have κυρίου ( kuriou , “Lord”) before ᾿Ιησοῦ Χριστοῦ ( Ihsou Cristou , “Jesus Christ”), but this is a typical scribal addition, motivated by pietistic and liturgical concerns. Further, early and excellent mss (A B Ψ 048 0232 81 323 1739 al ) lack κυρίου . Thus, both internally and externally, the shorter reading is strongly preferred.


text: “Some” is not in the Greek text, but is supplied because the prepositional phrase beginning with ἐκ ( ek ) has partitive force. The partitive force of the prepositional phrase here has been taken by some interpreters to mean that the author has found some of the elect lady’s children who are living according to the truth and some who are not. This is grammatically possible, but the author has merely stated that he knows of some Christians in the church addressed who are “walking in the truth.” He does not know for certain that all of them are, and concern over this is probably part of the motivation for writing the letter.


text: Grk “just as we received commandment from the Father.” The idiom “we received commandment from the Father” means the Father gave (a) commandment to them (the author plus the recipients).


text: The introductory καὶ νῦν ( kai nun ) has some adversative (contrastive) force: The addressees are already “living according to the truth” (v. 4 ) but in the face of the threat posed by the opponents, the author has to stress obedience all the more.


text: The words “if I were” are not in the Greek text, but are supplied for clarity in English.


text: “The one” is not in the Greek text. It is supplied for clarity in English.


text: The ἵνα ( Jina ) clause indicates content.


text: Or “that we live.”


text: The ἵνα ( Jina ) clause indicates result, parallel to John 13:34 where the final ἵνα clause also indicates result.


text: Or “should live in obedience to it.”


text: Technically this ὅτι ( Joti ) clause is subordinate to the verb περιπατῆτε ( peripathte ) at the end of v. 6 , giving the reason why the readers should walk in the commandment to love one another. But BDF §456.1 notes that subordination “is often very loose” in such cases and can be translated “for.” Thus the ὅτι assumes something of an inferential sense, drawing an inference based on what has preceded.


text: “As” is not in the Greek text. It is supplied for clarity in English, since (like in the same confession in 1 John 4:2 ) ᾿Ιησοῦν ( Ihsoun ) should be understood as object and Χριστόν ( Criston ) as complement of an object-complement double accusative construction.


text: Or “Messiah.”


text: This is the same confession as in 1 John 4:2 except the perfect participle used there is replaced by a present participle ( ἐρχόμενον , ercomenon ) here. It is not clear why the author changed from a perfect participle in 1 John 4:2 to a present participle here. The perfect participle suggests a reference to the incarnation (past). The present participle could suggest a reference to the (future) second advent, but based on the similarity to 1 John 4:2 it is probably best to take it as referring to the incarnation.


text: The construction πᾶς ὁ ( pas Jo ) + participle occur frequently in 1 John (13 times) where it is used by the author to divide people into categories: “everyone who does this” as opposed to “everyone who does the opposite.”


text: Here μένω ( menw ) has been translated “remain” rather than “reside” since a change in status or position is present in the context: The opponents did not “remain” but “ran on ahead.” The verb μένω is used only here (twice in this verse) in the Johannine letters in connection with “teaching” but in the Gospel of John it is used three times with reference to the teaching of Jesus himself ( 7:16, 17; 18:19 ).


text: The genitive τοῦ Χριστοῦ ( tou Cristou , “of Christ”) is difficult because it may be understood as objective (the teaching about Christ), subjective (Christ’s own teaching), or both (M. Zerwick’s “general” genitive [ Biblical Greek §§36-39]; D. B. Wallace’s “plenary” genitive [ ExSyn 119-21]). An objective genitive (with Christ as the object of the “apostolic” teaching) might seem to be the obvious reading in context, especially since verse 7 makes reference to what a person “confesses” about Jesus Christ. A good case can also be made for a subjective genitive, however, since other Johannine uses of the genitive following the noun διδαχή ( didach , “teaching”) favor a subjective sense here. In John 7:16, 17 Jesus himself refers to “my teaching” and “teaching from me,” and 18:19 refers to “his (Jesus’) teaching.” Rev 2:14, 15 refers to the “teaching of Balaam” and “the teaching of the Nicolaitans,” both of which are clearly subjective in context. In the present context, to speak of “Christ's teaching” as a subjective genitive would make Christ himself (in the person of the indwelling Spirit) the teacher, and this is consistent with the author’s position in 1 John 2:27 that the community does not need other teachers. In 1 John 2:27 it is the Paraclete, referred to as “his anointing,” who does the teaching. Since the dispute with the opponents concerns the salvific significance of the earthly life and ministry of Jesus, the “teaching” here would refer to Jesus’ own teaching (reflected in the Gospel of John) concerning his person and work. Since this is ultimately one with the apostolic eyewitness testimony about Jesus, it is perhaps best to view the genitive here as both objective and subjective (perhaps the author deliberately intended not to be specific).


text: “Other” is not in the Greek text but is supplied for clarity in English.


text: Grk “by means of.”


text: Grk “speak mouth to mouth,” an idiom for which the English equivalent is “speak face to face.”


text: The Byzantine text has ἀμήν ( amhn , “amen”) at the conclusion of this letter. Such a conclusion is routinely added by scribes to NT books because a few of these books originally had such an ending (cf. Rom 16:27 ; Gal 6:18 ; Jude 25 ). A majority of Greek witnesses have the concluding ἀμήν in every NT book except Acts, James, and 3 John (and even in these books, ἀμήν is found in some witnesses). It is thus a predictable variant. Further, the particle is lacking in excellent, early, and diffuse witnesses ( א A B P Ψ 33 81 323 1739 1881 al co), rendering its omission the strongly preferred reading.