translation_id: net-engnet

book_id: ROM

label: NET translator note

text: Ï ) added ἀλλὰ κατὰ πνεῦμα ( alla kata pneuma , “but [who do walk] according to the Spirit”). Both the external evidence and the internal evidence are compelling for the shortest reading. The scribes were evidently motivated to add such qualifications (interpolated from v. 4 ) to insulate Paul’s gospel from charges that it was characterized too much by grace. The KJV follows the longest reading found in Ï .


text: Grk “for the law of the Spirit of life.”


text: 1881 Ï lat sa). The second person singular pronoun σε ( se ) is superior because of external support ( א B {F which reads σαι } G 1506* 1739*) and internal support (it is the harder reading since ch. was narrated in the first person). At the same time, it could have arisen via dittography from the final syllable of the verb preceding it ( ἠλευθέρωσεν , hleuqerwsen ; “has set free”). But for this to happen in such early and diverse witnesses is unlikely, especially as it depends on various scribes repeatedly overlooking either the nu or the nu -bar at the end of the verb.


text: Grk “in that.”


text: Grk “think on” or “are intent on” (twice in this verse). What is in view here is not primarily preoccupation, however, but worldview. Translations like “set their mind on” could be misunderstood by the typical English reader to refer exclusively to preoccupation.


text: Or “mindset,” “way of thinking” (twice in this verse and once in v. 7 ). The Greek term φρόνημα does not refer to one’s mind, but to one’s outlook or mindset.


text: Or “are not controlled by the flesh but by the Spirit.”


text: Greek emphasizes the contrast between these two clauses more than can be easily expressed in English.


text: Or “life-giving.” Grk “the Spirit is life.”


text: F G Ψ 33 Ï sa) and internal evidence (scribes were much more likely to add the name “Jesus” if it were lacking than to remove it if it were already present in the text, especially to harmonize with the earlier mention of Jesus in the verse).


text: 81 104 1505 1506 al , and is slightly preferred.


text: There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing.


text: Grk “brothers.” See note on the phrase “brothers and sisters” in 1:13 .


text: Grk “are about to, are certainly going to.”


text: Grk “For as many as are being led by the Spirit of God, these are.”


text: Grk “slavery again to fear.”


text: The Greek term υἱοθεσία ( Juioqesia ) was originally a legal technical term for adoption as a son with full rights of inheritance. BDAG 1024 s.v. notes, “a legal t.t. of ‘adoption’ of children, in our lit., i.e. in Paul, only in a transferred sense of a transcendent filial relationship between God and humans (with the legal aspect, not gender specificity, as major semantic component).”


text: Or “in that.”


text: Or possibly “with.” ExSyn 160-61, however, notes the following: “At issue, grammatically, is whether the Spirit testifies alongside of our spirit (dat. of association), or whether he testifies to our spirit (indirect object) that we are God’s children. If the former, the one receiving this testimony is unstated (is it God? or believers?). If the latter, the believer receives the testimony and hence is assured of salvation via the inner witness of the Spirit. The first view has the advantage of a σύν - ( sun -) prefixed verb, which might be expected to take an accompanying dat. of association (and is supported by NEB, JB, etc.). But there are three reasons why πνεύματι ( pneumati ) should not be taken as association: (1) Grammatically, a dat. with a σύν - prefixed verb does not necessarily indicate association. This, of course, does not preclude such here, but this fact at least opens up the alternatives in this text. (2) Lexically, though συμμαρτυρέω ( summarturew ) originally bore an associative idea, it developed in the direction of merely intensifying μαρτυρέω ( marturew ). This is surely the case in the only other NT text with a dat. ( Rom 9:1 ). (3) Contextually, a dat. of association does not seem to support Paul’s argument: ‘What standing has our spirit in this matter? Of itself it surely has no right at all to testify to our being sons of God’ [C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans [ICC], 1:403]. In sum, Rom 8:16 seems to be secure as a text in which the believer’s assurance of salvation is based on the inner witness of the Spirit. The implications of this for one’s soteriology are profound: The objective data, as helpful as they are, cannot by themselves provide assurance of salvation; the believer also needs (and receives) an existential, ongoing encounter with God’s Spirit in order to gain that familial comfort.”


text: Grk “on the one hand, heirs of God; on the other hand, fellow heirs with Christ.” Some prefer to render v. 17 as follows: “And if children, then heirs – that is, heirs of God. Also fellow heirs with Christ if indeed we suffer with him so we may also be glorified with him.” Such a translation suggests two distinct inheritances, one coming to all of God’s children, the other coming only to those who suffer with Christ. The difficulty of this view, however, is that it ignores the correlative conjunctions μέν … δέ ( men … de , “on the one hand…on the other hand”): The construction strongly suggests that the inheritances cannot be separated since both explain “then heirs.” For this reason, the preferred translation puts this explanation in parentheses.


text: Grk “are not worthy [to be compared].”


text: Grk “because of the one”; the referent (God) has been specified in the translation for clarity.


text: Or “who have the Spirit as firstfruits.” The genitive πνεύματος ( pneumatos ) can be understood here as possessive (“the firstfruits belonging to the Spirit”) although it is much more likely that this is a genitive of apposition (“the firstfruits, namely, the Spirit”); cf. TEV, NLT.


text: See the note on “adoption” in v. 15 .


text: Grk “body.”


text: Or “perseverance.”


text: Or “for we do not know what we ought to pray for.”


text: Grk “he,” or “it”; the referent (the Spirit) has been specified in the translation for clarity.


text: A B 81 sa; the shorter reading is found in א C D F G Ψ 33 1739 1881 Ï latt sy bo. Although the inclusion is supported by a significant early papyrus, the alliance of significant Alexandrian and Western witnesses favors the shorter reading. As well, the longer reading is evidently motivated by a need for clarification. Since ὁ θεός is textually suspect, it is better to read the text without it. This leaves two good translational options: either “he works all things together for good” or “all things work together for good.” In the first instance the subject is embedded in the verb and “God” is clearly implied (as in v. 29 ). In the second instance, πάντα ( panta ) becomes the subject of an intransitive verb. In either case, “What is expressed is a truly biblical confidence in the sovereignty of God” (C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans [ICC], 1:427).


text: Grk “he”; the referent (God’s Son) has been specified in the translation for clarity.


text: Grk “[he] who.” The relative clause continues the question of v. 31 in a way that is awkward in English. The force of v. 32 is thus: “who indeed did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all – How will he not also with him give us all things?”


text: has the word in brackets, indicating doubt as to its authenticity. Grk “who also.”


text: Here “sword” is a metonymy that includes both threats of violence and acts of violence, even including death (although death is not necessarily the only thing in view here).


text: BDAG 1034 s.v. ὑπερνικάω states, “as a heightened form of νικᾶν prevail completely ὑπερνικῶμεν we are winning a most glorious victory Ro 8:37 .”


text: Here the referent could be either God or Christ, but in v. 39 it is God’s love that is mentioned.


text: BDAG 138 s.v. ἀρχή 6 takes this term as a reference to angelic or transcendent powers (as opposed to merely human rulers). To clarify this, the adjective “heavenly” has been supplied in the translation. Some interpreters see this as a reference to fallen angels or demonic powers, and this view is reflected in some recent translations (NIV, NLT).