<hi type="bold">6. If--</hi>Greek, "And (yet) have fallen away"; compare a less extreme falling or declension, <reference osisRef="Gal.5.4">Ga 5:4</reference>, "Ye are fallen from grace." Here an entire and wilful apostasy is meant; the Hebrews had not yet so fallen away; but he warns them that such would be the final result of retrogression, if, instead of "going on to perfection," they should need to learn again the first principles of Christianity (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.1">He 6:1</reference>).

<hi type="bold">to renew them again--</hi>They have been "once" (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.4">He 6:4</reference>) already renewed, or made anew, and now they need to be "renewed" over "again."

<hi type="bold">crucify to themselves the Son of God--</hi>"are crucifiying to themselves" Christ, instead of, like Paul, crucifying the world unto them by the cross of Christ (<reference osisRef="Gal.6.14">Ga 6:14</reference>). So in <reference osisRef="Heb.10.29">He 10:29</reference>, "trodden under foot the Son of God, and counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith ... sanctified, an unholy thing." "The Son of God," marking His dignity, shows the greatness of their offense.

<hi type="bold">put him to an open shame--</hi>literally, "make a public example of" Him, as if He were a malefactor suspended on a tree. What the carnal Israel did outwardly, those who fall away from light do inwardly, they virtually crucify again the Son of God; "they tear him out of the recesses of their hearts where He had fixed His abode and exhibit Him to the open scoffs of the world as something powerless and common" [Bleek in Alford]. The Montanists and Novatians used this passage to justify the lasting exclusion from the Church of those who had once lapsed. The Catholic Church always opposed this view, and readmitted the lapsed on their repentance, but did not rebaptize them. This passage implies that persons may be in some sense "renewed," and yet fall away finally; for the words, "renew again," imply that they have been, in some sense, not the full sense, ONCE RENEWED by the Holy Ghost; but certainly not that they are "the elect," for these can never fall away, being chosen unto everlasting life (<reference osisRef="John.10.28">Joh 10:28</reference>). The elect abide in Christ, hear and continuously obey His voice, and do not fall away. He who abides not in Christ, is cast forth as a withered branch; but he who abides in Him becomes more and more free from sin; the wicked one cannot touch him; and he by faith overcomes the world. A temporary faith is possible, without one thereby being constituted one of the elect (<reference osisRef="Mark.4.16">Mr 4:16</reference>, <reference osisRef="Mark.4.17">17</reference>). At the same time it does not limit God's grace, as if it were "impossible" for God to reclaim even such a hardened rebel so as yet to look on Him whom he has pierced. The impossibility rests in their having known in themselves once the power of Christ's sacrifice, and yet now rejecting it; there cannot possibly be any new means devised for their renewal afresh, and the means provided by God's love they now, after experience of them, deliberately and continuously reject; their conscience being served, and they "twice dead" (Jude 12), are now past hope, except by a miracle of God's grace. "It is the curse of evil eternally to propagate evil" [Tholuck]. "He who is led into the whole (?) compass of Christian experiences, may yet cease to abide in them; he who abides not in them, was, at the very time when he had those objective experiences, not subjectively true to them; otherwise there would have been fulfilled in him, "Whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance" (<reference osisRef="Matt.13.12">Mt 13:12</reference>), so that he would have abided in them and not have fallen away" [Tholuck]. Such a one was never truly a Spirit-led disciple of Christ (<reference osisRef="Rom.8.14-Rom.8.17">Ro 8:14-17</reference>). The sin against the Holy Ghost, though somewhat similar, is not identical with this sin; for that sin may be committed by those outside the Church (as in <reference osisRef="Matt.12.24">Mt 12:24</reference>, 31, 32); this, only by those inside.

6. If-- Greek, "And (yet) have fallen away"; compare a less extreme falling or declension, Ga 5:4, "Ye are fallen from grace." Here an entire and wilful apostasy is meant; the Hebrews had not yet so fallen away; but he warns them that such would be the final result of retrogression, if, instead of "going on to perfection," they should need to learn again the first principles of Christianity (He 6:1). to renew them again-- They have been "once" (He 6:4) already renewed, or made anew, and now they need to be "renewed" over "again." crucify to themselves the Son of God-- "are crucifiying to themselves" Christ, instead of, like Paul, crucifying the world unto them by the cross of Christ (Ga 6:14). So in He 10:29, "trodden under foot the Son of God, and counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith... sanctified, an unholy thing." "The Son of God," marking His dignity, shows the greatness of their offense. put him to an open shame-- literally, "make a public example of" Him, as if He were a malefactor suspended on a tree. What the carnal Israel did outwardly, those who fall away from light do inwardly, they virtually crucify again the Son of God; "they tear him out of the recesses of their hearts where He had fixed His abode and exhibit Him to the open scoffs of the world as something powerless and common" [Bleek in Alford]. The Montanists and Novatians used this passage to justify the lasting exclusion from the Church of those who had once lapsed. The Catholic Church always opposed this view, and readmitted the lapsed on their repentance, but did not rebaptize them. This passage implies that persons may be in some sense "renewed," and yet fall away finally; for the words, "renew again," imply that they have been, in some sense, not the full sense, ONCE RENEWED by the Holy Ghost; but certainly not that they are "the elect," for these can never fall away, being chosen unto everlasting life (Joh 10:28). The elect abide in Christ, hear and continuously obey His voice, and do not fall away. He who abides not in Christ, is cast forth as a withered branch; but he who abides in Him becomes more and more free from sin; the wicked one cannot touch him; and he by faith overcomes the world. A temporary faith is possible, without one thereby being constituted one of the elect (Mr 4:16, 17). At the same time it does not limit God's grace, as if it were "impossible" for God to reclaim even such a hardened rebel so as yet to look on Him whom he has pierced. The impossibility rests in their having known in themselves once the power of Christ's sacrifice, and yet now rejecting it; there cannot possibly be any new means devised for their renewal afresh, and the means provided by God's love they now, after experience of them, deliberately and continuously reject; their conscience being served, and they "twice dead" (Jude 12), are now past hope, except by a miracle of God's grace. "It is the curse of evil eternally to propagate evil" [Tholuck]. "He who is led into the whole (?) compass of Christian experiences, may yet cease to abide in them; he who abides not in them, was, at the very time when he had those objective experiences, not subjectively true to them; otherwise there would have been fulfilled in him, "Whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance" (Mt 13:12), so that he would have abided in them and not have fallen away" [Tholuck]. Such a one was never truly a Spirit-led disciple of Christ (Ro 8:14-17). The sin against the Holy Ghost, though somewhat similar, is not identical with this sin; for that sin may be committed by those outside the Church (as in Mt 12:24, 31, 32); this, only by those inside.


<hi type="bold">7. the earth--</hi>rather as Greek (no article), "land."

<hi type="bold">which drinketh in--</hi>Greek, "which has drunk in"; not merely receiving it on the surface. Answering to those who have enjoyed the privilege of Christian experiences, being in some sense renewed by the Holy Ghost; true alike of those who persevere and those who "fall away."

<hi type="bold">the rain that cometh oft upon it--</hi>not merely failing over it, or towards it, but falling and resting upon it so as to cover it (the Greek genitive, not the accusative). The "oft" implies, on God's part, the riches of His abounding grace ("coming" spontaneously, and often); and, on the apostate's part, the wilful perversity whereby he has done continual despite to the oft-repeated motions of the Spirit. Compare "How often," <reference osisRef="Matt.23.37">Mt 23:37</reference>. The rain of heaven falls both on the elect and the apostates.

<hi type="bold">bringeth forth--</hi>as the natural result of "having drunk in the rain." See above.

<hi type="bold">herbs--</hi>provender.

<hi type="bold">meet--</hi>fit. Such as the master of the soil wishes. The opposite of "rejected," <reference osisRef="Heb.6.8">He 6:8</reference>.

<hi type="bold">by whom--</hi>rather as Greek, "for (that is, on account of) whom," namely, the lords of the soil; not the laborers, as English Version, namely, God and His Christ (<reference osisRef="1Cor.3.9">1Co 3:9</reference>). The heart of man is the earth; man is the dresser; herbs are brought forth meet, not for the dresser, by whom, but for God, the owner of the soil, for whom it is dressed. The plural is general, the owners whoever they may be; here God.

<hi type="bold">receiveth--</hi>"partaketh of."

<hi type="bold">blessing--</hi>fruitfulness. Contrast God's curse causing unfruitfulness (<reference osisRef="Gen.3.17">Ge 3:17</reference>, <reference osisRef="Gen.3.18">18</reference>); also spiritually (<reference osisRef="Jer.17.5-Jer.17.8">Jr 17:5-8</reference>).

<hi type="bold">from God--</hi>Man's use of means is vain unless God bless (<reference osisRef="1Cor.3.6">1Co 3:6</reference>, <reference osisRef="1Cor.3.7">7</reference>).

7. the earth-- rather as Greek (no article), "land." which drinketh in-- Greek, "which has drunk in"; not merely receiving it on the surface. Answering to those who have enjoyed the privilege of Christian experiences, being in some sense renewed by the Holy Ghost; true alike of those who persevere and those who "fall away." the rain that cometh oft upon it-- not merely failing over it, or towards it, but falling and resting upon it so as to cover it (the Greek genitive, not the accusative). The "oft" implies, on God's part, the riches of His abounding grace ("coming" spontaneously, and often); and, on the apostate's part, the wilful perversity whereby he has done continual despite to the oft-repeated motions of the Spirit. Compare "How often," Mt 23:37. The rain of heaven falls both on the elect and the apostates. bringeth forth-- as the natural result of "having drunk in the rain." See above. herbs-- provender. meet-- fit. Such as the master of the soil wishes. The opposite of "rejected," He 6:8. by whom-- rather as Greek, "for (that is, on account of) whom," namely, the lords of the soil; not the laborers, as English Version, namely, God and His Christ (1Co 3:9). The heart of man is the earth; man is the dresser; herbs are brought forth meet, not for the dresser, by whom, but for God, the owner of the soil, for whom it is dressed. The plural is general, the owners whoever they may be; here God. receiveth-- "partaketh of." blessing-- fruitfulness. Contrast God's curse causing unfruitfulness (Ge 3:17, 18); also spiritually (Jr 17:5-8). from God-- Man's use of means is vain unless God bless (1Co 3:6, 7).


<hi type="bold">8. that which--</hi>rather as Greek (no article), "But if it (the 'land,' <reference osisRef="Heb.6.7">He 6:7</reference>) bear"; not so favorable a word as "bringeth forth," <reference osisRef="Heb.6.7">He 6:7</reference>, said of the good soil.

<hi type="bold">briers--</hi>Greek, "thistles."

<hi type="bold">rejected--</hi>after having been tested; so the Greek implies. Reprobate ... rejected by the Lord.

<hi type="bold">nigh unto cursing--</hi>on the verge of being given up to its own barrenness by the just curse of God. This "nigh" softens the severity of the previous "It is impossible," &c. (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.4">He 6:4</reference>, <reference osisRef="Heb.6.6">6</reference>). The ground is not yet actually cursed.

<hi type="bold">whose--</hi>"of which (land) the end is unto burning," namely, with the consuming fire of the last judgment; as the land of Sodom was given to "brimstone, salt, and burning" (<reference osisRef="Deut.29.23">De 29:23</reference>); so as to the ungodly (<reference osisRef="Matt.3.10">Mt 3:10</reference>, <reference osisRef="Matt.3.12">12</reference>; <reference osisRef="Matt.7.19">7:19</reference>; <reference osisRef="Matt.13.30">13:30</reference>; <reference osisRef="John.15.6">Joh 15:6</reference>; <reference osisRef="2Pet.3.10">2Pe 3:10</reference>). Jerusalem, which had so resisted the grace of Christ, was then nigh unto cursing, and in a few years was burned. Compare <reference osisRef="Matt.22.7">Mt 22:7</reference>, "burned up their city" an earnest of a like fate to all wilful abusers of God's grace (<reference osisRef="Heb.10.26">He 10:26</reference>, <reference osisRef="Heb.10.27">27</reference>).

8. that which-- rather as Greek (no article), "But if it (the 'land,' He 6:7) bear"; not so favorable a word as "bringeth forth," He 6:7, said of the good soil. briers-- Greek, "thistles." rejected-- after having been tested; so the Greek implies. Reprobate... rejected by the Lord. nigh unto cursing-- on the verge of being given up to its own barrenness by the just curse of God. This "nigh" softens the severity of the previous "It is impossible," &c. (He 6:4, 6). The ground is not yet actually cursed. whose-- "of which (land) the end is unto burning," namely, with the consuming fire of the last judgment; as the land of Sodom was given to "brimstone, salt, and burning" (De 29:23); so as to the ungodly (Mt 3:10, 12; 7:19; 13:30; Joh 15:6; 2Pe 3:10). Jerusalem, which had so resisted the grace of Christ, was then nigh unto cursing, and in a few years was burned. Compare Mt 22:7, "burned up their city" an earnest of a like fate to all wilful abusers of God's grace (He 10:26, 27).


<hi type="bold">9. beloved--</hi>appositely here introduced; LOVE to you prompts me in the strong warnings I have just given, not that I entertain unfavorable thoughts of you; nay, I anticipate better things of you; Greek "the things which are better"; that ye are not thorn-bearing, or nigh unto cursing, and doomed unto burning, but heirs of salvation in accordance with God's faithfulness (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.10">He 6:10</reference>).

<hi type="bold">we are persuaded--</hi>on good grounds; the result of proof. Compare <reference osisRef="Rom.15.14">Ro 15:14</reference>, "I myself am persuaded of you, my brethren, that ye are full of goodness." A confirmation of the Pauline authorship of this Epistle.

<hi type="bold">things that accompany--</hi>Greek, "things that hold by," that is, are close unto "salvation." Things that are linked unto salvation (compare <reference osisRef="Heb.6.19">He 6:19</reference>). In opposition to "nigh unto cursing."

<hi type="bold">though--</hi>Greek, "if even we thus speak." "For it is better to make you afraid with words, that ye may not suffer in fact."

9. beloved-- appositely here introduced; LOVE to you prompts me in the strong warnings I have just given, not that I entertain unfavorable thoughts of you; nay, I anticipate better things of you; Greek "the things which are better"; that ye are not thorn-bearing, or nigh unto cursing, and doomed unto burning, but heirs of salvation in accordance with God's faithfulness (He 6:10). we are persuaded-- on good grounds; the result of proof. Compare Ro 15:14, "I myself am persuaded of you, my brethren, that ye are full of goodness." A confirmation of the Pauline authorship of this Epistle. things that accompany-- Greek, "things that hold by," that is, are close unto "salvation." Things that are linked unto salvation (compare He 6:19). In opposition to "nigh unto cursing." though-- Greek, "if even we thus speak." "For it is better to make you afraid with words, that ye may not suffer in fact."


<hi type="bold">10. not unrighteous--</hi>not unfaithful to His own gracious promise. Not that we have any inherent right to claim reward; for (1) a servant has no merit, as he only does that which is his bounden duty; (2) our best performances bear no proportion to what we leave undone; (3) all strength comes from God; but God has promised of His own grace to reward the good works of His people (already accepted through faith in Christ); it is His promise, not our merits, which would make it unrighteous were He not to reward His people's works. God will be no man's debtor.

<hi type="bold">your work--</hi>your whole Christian life of active obedience.

<hi type="bold">labour of love--</hi>The oldest manuscripts omit "labor of," which probably crept in from <reference osisRef="1Thess.1.3">1Th 1:3</reference>. As "love" occurs here, so "hope," <reference osisRef="Heb.6.11">He 6:11</reference>, "faith," <reference osisRef="Heb.6.12">He 6:12</reference>; as in <reference osisRef="1Cor.13.13">1Co 13:13</reference>: the Pauline triad. By their love he sharpens their hope and faith.

<hi type="bold">ye have showed--</hi>(Compare <reference osisRef="Heb.10.32-Heb.10.34">He 10:32-34</reference>).

<hi type="bold">toward his name--</hi>Your acts of love to the saints were done for His name's sake. The distressed condition of the Palestinian Christians appears from the collection for them. Though receiving bounty from other churches, and therefore not able to minister much by pecuniary help, yet those somewhat better off could minister to the greatest sufferers in their Church in various other ways (compare <reference osisRef="2Tim.1.18">2Ti 1:18</reference>). Paul, as elsewhere, gives them the utmost credit for their graces, while delicately hinting the need of perseverance, a lack of which had probably somewhat begun to show itself.

10. not unrighteous-- not unfaithful to His own gracious promise. Not that we have any inherent right to claim reward; for (1) a servant has no merit, as he only does that which is his bounden duty; (2) our best performances bear no proportion to what we leave undone; (3) all strength comes from God; but God has promised of His own grace to reward the good works of His people (already accepted through faith in Christ); it is His promise, not our merits, which would make it unrighteous were He not to reward His people's works. God will be no man's debtor. your work-- your whole Christian life of active obedience. labour of love-- The oldest manuscripts omit "labor of," which probably crept in from 1Th 1:3. As "love" occurs here, so "hope," He 6:11, "faith," He 6:12; as in 1Co 13:13: the Pauline triad. By their love he sharpens their hope and faith. ye have showed-- (Compare He 10:32-34). toward his name-- Your acts of love to the saints were done for His name's sake. The distressed condition of the Palestinian Christians appears from the collection for them. Though receiving bounty from other churches, and therefore not able to minister much by pecuniary help, yet those somewhat better off could minister to the greatest sufferers in their Church in various other ways (compare 2Ti 1:18). Paul, as elsewhere, gives them the utmost credit for their graces, while delicately hinting the need of perseverance, a lack of which had probably somewhat begun to show itself.


<hi type="bold">11. And--</hi>Greek, "But."

<hi type="bold">desire--</hi>Greek, "earnestly desire." The language of fatherly affection, rather than command.

<hi type="bold">every one of you--</hi>implying that all in the Palestinian churches had not shown the same diligence as some of those whom he praises in <reference osisRef="Heb.6.10">He 6:10</reference>. "He cares alike for great and small, and overlooks none." "Every one of them," even those diligent in acts of LOVE (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.10">He 6:10</reference>), needed to be stimulated to persevere in the same diligence with a view to the full assurance of HOPE unto the end. They needed, besides love, patient perseverance, resting on hope and faith (<reference osisRef="Heb.10.36">He 10:36</reference>; <reference osisRef="Heb.13.7">13:7</reference>). Compare "the full assurance of faith," <reference osisRef="Heb.10.22">He 10:22</reference>; <reference osisRef="Rom.4.21">Ro 4:21</reference>; <reference osisRef="1Thess.1.5">1Th 1:5</reference>.

<hi type="bold">unto the end--</hi>the coming of Christ.

11. And-- Greek, "But." desire-- Greek, "earnestly desire." The language of fatherly affection, rather than command. every one of you-- implying that all in the Palestinian churches had not shown the same diligence as some of those whom he praises in He 6:10. "He cares alike for great and small, and overlooks none." "Every one of them," even those diligent in acts of LOVE (He 6:10), needed to be stimulated to persevere in the same diligence with a view to the full assurance of HOPE unto the end. They needed, besides love, patient perseverance, resting on hope and faith (He 10:36; 13:7). Compare "the full assurance of faith," He 10:22; Ro 4:21; 1Th 1:5. unto the end-- the coming of Christ.


<hi type="bold">12. be not--</hi>Greek, "become not." In <reference osisRef="Heb.5.11">He 5:11</reference>, he said, "Ye have become dull (Greek, 'slothful') of hearing"; here he warns them not to become "slothful absolutely," namely, also in mind and deed. He will not become slothful who keeps always the end in view; hope is the means of ensuring this.

<hi type="bold">followers--</hi>Greek, "imitators"; so in <reference osisRef="Eph.5.1">Ep 5:1</reference>, Greek; <reference osisRef="1Cor.11.1">1Co 11:1</reference>.

<hi type="bold">patience--</hi>Greek, "long-suffering endurance." There is the long-suffering patience, or endurance of love, <reference osisRef="1Cor.13.4">1Co 13:4</reference>, and that of faith, <reference osisRef="Heb.6.15">He 6:15</reference>.

<hi type="bold">them who ... inherit the promises--</hi>Greek, "who are inheriting," &c.; to whom the promises are their inheritance. Not that they have actually entered on the perfect inheritance, which <reference osisRef="Heb.11.13">He 11:13</reference>, 39, 40 explicitly denies; though doubtless the dead in Christ have, in the disembodied soul, a foretaste of it; but "them (enumerated in <reference osisRef="Heb.11.2-Heb.11.40">He 11:2-40</reference>) who in every age have been, are, or shall be, inheritors of the promises"; of whom Abraham is an illustrious example (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.13">He 6:13</reference>).

12. be not-- Greek, "become not." In He 5:11, he said, "Ye have become dull (Greek, 'slothful') of hearing"; here he warns them not to become "slothful absolutely," namely, also in mind and deed. He will not become slothful who keeps always the end in view; hope is the means of ensuring this. followers-- Greek, "imitators"; so in Ep 5:1, Greek; 1Co 11:1. patience-- Greek, "long-suffering endurance." There is the long-suffering patience, or endurance of love, 1Co 13:4, and that of faith, He 6:15. them who... inherit the promises-- Greek, "who are inheriting," &c.; to whom the promises are their inheritance. Not that they have actually entered on the perfect inheritance, which He 11:13, 39, 40 explicitly denies; though doubtless the dead in Christ have, in the disembodied soul, a foretaste of it; but "them (enumerated in He 11:2-40) who in every age have been, are, or shall be, inheritors of the promises"; of whom Abraham is an illustrious example (He 6:13).


<hi type="bold">13. For--</hi>confirming the reasonableness of resting on "the promises" as infallibly sure, resting as they do on God's oath, by the instance of Abraham. "He now gives consolation, by the oath of God's grace, to those whom, in the second, third, and fourth chapters, he had warned by the oath of God's 'wrath.' The oath of wrath did not primarily extend its force beyond the wilderness; but the oath of grace is in force for ever" [Bengel].

13. For-- confirming the reasonableness of resting on "the promises" as infallibly sure, resting as they do on God's oath, by the instance of Abraham. "He now gives consolation, by the oath of God's grace, to those whom, in the second, third, and fourth chapters, he had warned by the oath of God's 'wrath.' The oath of wrath did not primarily extend its force beyond the wilderness; but the oath of grace is in force for ever" [Bengel].


<hi type="bold">14. multiplying ... multiply--</hi>Hebraism for superabundantly multiply.

<hi type="bold">thee--</hi>The increase of Abraham's seed is virtually an increase of himself. The argument here refers to Abraham himself as an example; therefore Paul quotes <reference osisRef="Gen.22.17">Ge 22:17</reference>, "thee," instead of "thy seed."

14. multiplying... multiply-- Hebraism for superabundantly multiply. thee-- The increase of Abraham's seed is virtually an increase of himself. The argument here refers to Abraham himself as an example; therefore Paul quotes Ge 22:17, "thee," instead of "thy seed."


<hi type="bold">15. so--</hi>thus relying on the promise.

15. so-- thus relying on the promise.


<hi type="bold">16. for confirmation--</hi>not to be joined, as English Version, to "an oath"; but to "an end" [Alford]. I prefer, "The oath is to them, in respect to confirmation (of one's solemn promise or covenant; as here, God's), an end of all contradiction (so the Greek is translated, <reference osisRef="Heb.12.3">He 12:3</reference>), or "gainsaying." This passage shows: (1) an oath is sanctioned even in the Christian dispensation as lawful; (2) that the limits to its use are, that it only be employed where it can put an end to contradiction in disputes, and for confirmation of a solemn promise.

16. for confirmation-- not to be joined, as English Version, to "an oath"; but to "an end" [Alford]. I prefer, "The oath is to them, in respect to confirmation (of one's solemn promise or covenant; as here, God's), an end of all contradiction (so the Greek is translated, He 12:3), or "gainsaying." This passage shows: (1) an oath is sanctioned even in the Christian dispensation as lawful; (2) that the limits to its use are, that it only be employed where it can put an end to contradiction in disputes, and for confirmation of a solemn promise.


<hi type="bold">17. Wherein--</hi>that is, Which being the case among men, God, in accommodation to their manner of confirming covenants, superadded to His sure word His oath: the "TWO immutable things" (<reference osisRef="Heb.6.18">He 6:18</reference>).

<hi type="bold">willing ... counsel--</hi>Greek, "willing ... will"; words akin. Expressing the utmost benignity [Bengel].

<hi type="bold">more abundantly--</hi>than had He not sworn. His word would have been amply enough; but, to make assurance doubly sure, He "interposed with an oath" (so the Greek). Literally, He acted as Mediator, coming between Himself and us; as if He were less, while He swears, than Himself by whom He swears (for the less among men usually swear by the greater). Dost thou not yet believe, thou that hearest the promise? [Bengel].

<hi type="bold">heirs of promise--</hi>not only Abraham's literal, but also his spiritual, seed (<reference osisRef="Gal.3.29">Ga 3:29</reference>).

17. Wherein-- that is, Which being the case among men, God, in accommodation to their manner of confirming covenants, superadded to His sure word His oath: the "TWO immutable things" (He 6:18). willing... counsel-- Greek, "willing... will"; words akin. Expressing the utmost benignity [Bengel]. more abundantly-- than had He not sworn. His word would have been amply enough; but, to make assurance doubly sure, He "interposed with an oath" (so the Greek). Literally, He acted as Mediator, coming between Himself and us; as if He were less, while He swears, than Himself by whom He swears (for the less among men usually swear by the greater). Dost thou not yet believe, thou that hearest the promise? [Bengel]. heirs of promise-- not only Abraham's literal, but also his spiritual, seed (Ga 3:29).


<hi type="bold">18. immutable--</hi>Translate, as in <reference osisRef="Heb.6.17">He 6:17</reference>, "unchangeable."

<hi type="bold">impossible ... to lie--</hi>"ever to lie"; this is the force of the Greek aorist [Alford]. His not being able to deny Himself is a proof, not of weakness, but of strength incomparable.

<hi type="bold">consolation--</hi>under doubts and fears, and so "encouragement," literally, "exhortation."

<hi type="bold">fled for refuge--</hi>as if from a shipwreck; or, as one fleeing to one of the six cities of refuge. Kadesh, that is, holy, implies the holiness of Jesus, our Refuge. Shechem, that is, shoulder, the government is upon his shoulder (<reference osisRef="Isa.9.6">Is 9:6</reference>). Hebron, that is, fellowship, believers are called into the fellowship of Christ. Bezer, that is, a fortress, Christ is so to all who trust in Him. Ramoth, that is, high, for Him hath God exalted with His right hand (<reference osisRef="Acts.5.31">Ac 5:31</reference>). Golan, that is, joy, for in Him all the saints are justified and shall glory.

<hi type="bold">lay hold upon the hope--</hi>that is, the object of our hope, as upon a preservative from sinking.

<hi type="bold">set before us--</hi>as a prize for which we strive; a new image, namely, the race course (<reference osisRef="Heb.12.1">He 12:1</reference>, <reference osisRef="2Cor.12.2">2</reference>).

18. immutable-- Translate, as in He 6:17, "unchangeable." impossible... to lie-- "ever to lie"; this is the force of the Greek aorist [Alford]. His not being able to deny Himself is a proof, not of weakness, but of strength incomparable. consolation-- under doubts and fears, and so "encouragement," literally, "exhortation." fled for refuge-- as if from a shipwreck; or, as one fleeing to one of the six cities of refuge. Kadesh, that is, holy, implies the holiness of Jesus, our Refuge. Shechem, that is, shoulder, the government is upon his shoulder (Is 9:6). Hebron, that is, fellowship, believers are called into the fellowship of Christ. Bezer, that is, a fortress, Christ is so to all who trust in Him. Ramoth, that is, high, for Him hath God exalted with His right hand (Ac 5:31). Golan, that is, joy, for in Him all the saints are justified and shall glory. lay hold upon the hope-- that is, the object of our hope, as upon a preservative from sinking. set before us-- as a prize for which we strive; a new image, namely, the race course (He 12:1, 2).


19. Hope is found represented on coins by an anchor.

<hi type="bold">sure and steadfast--</hi>sure in respect to us: steadfast, or "firm" [Alford], in itself. Not such an anchor as will not keep the vessel from tossing, or an anchor unsound or too light [Theophylact].

<hi type="bold">which entereth into that--</hi>that is the place

<hi type="bold">within the veil--</hi>two images beautifully combined: (1) The soul is the ship: the world the sea: the bliss beyond the world, the distant coast; the hope resting on faith, the anchor which prevents the vessel being tossed to and fro; the encouraging consolation through the promise and oath of God, the cable connecting the ship and anchor. (2) The world is the fore-court: heaven, the Holy of Holies; Christ, the High Priest going before us, so as to enable us, after Him, and through Him, to enter within the veil. Estius explains, As the anchor does not stay in the waters, but enters the ground hidden beneath the waters, and fastens itself in it, so hope, our anchor of the soul, is not satisfied with merely coming to the vestibule, that is, is not content with merely earthly and visible goods, but penetrates even to those which are within the veil, namely, to the Holy of Holies, where it lays hold on God Himself, and heavenly goods, and fastens on them. "Hope, entering within heaven, hath made us already to be in the things promised to us, even while we are still below, and have not yet received them; such strength hope has, as to make those that are earthly to become heavenly." "The soul clings, as one in fear of shipwreck to an anchor, and sees not whither the cable of the anchor runs--where it is fastened: but she knows that it is fastened behind the veil which hides the future glory."

<hi type="bold">veil--</hi>Greek, "catapetasma": the second veil which shut in the Holiest Place. The outer veil was called by a distinct Greek term, calumma: "the second (that is, the inner) veil."

19. Hope is found represented on coins by an anchor. sure and steadfast-- sure in respect to us: steadfast, or "firm" [Alford], in itself. Not such an anchor as will not keep the vessel from tossing, or an anchor unsound or too light [Theophylact]. which entereth into that-- that is the place within the veil-- two images beautifully combined: (1) The soul is the ship: the world the sea: the bliss beyond the world, the distant coast; the hope resting on faith, the anchor which prevents the vessel being tossed to and fro; the encouraging consolation through the promise and oath of God, the cable connecting the ship and anchor. (2) The world is the fore-court: heaven, the Holy of Holies; Christ, the High Priest going before us, so as to enable us, after Him, and through Him, to enter within the veil. Estius explains, As the anchor does not stay in the waters, but enters the ground hidden beneath the waters, and fastens itself in it, so hope, our anchor of the soul, is not satisfied with merely coming to the vestibule, that is, is not content with merely earthly and visible goods, but penetrates even to those which are within the veil, namely, to the Holy of Holies, where it lays hold on God Himself, and heavenly goods, and fastens on them. "Hope, entering within heaven, hath made us already to be in the things promised to us, even while we are still below, and have not yet received them; such strength hope has, as to make those that are earthly to become heavenly." "The soul clings, as one in fear of shipwreck to an anchor, and sees not whither the cable of the anchor runs--where it is fastened: but she knows that it is fastened behind the veil which hides the future glory." veil-- Greek, "catapetasma": the second veil which shut in the Holiest Place. The outer veil was called by a distinct Greek term, calumma: "the second (that is, the inner) veil."


20. The absence of the Greek article requires Alford's translation, "Where. As forerunner for us (that is, in our behalf), entered Jesus" [and is now: this last clause is implied in the 'where' of the Greek, which implies being IN a place: 'whither' is understood to 'entered,' taken out of 'where'; whither Jesus entered, and where He is now]. The "for us" implies that it was not for Himself, as God, He needed to enter there, but as our High Priest, representing and introducing us, His followers, opening the way to us, by His intercession with the Father, as the Aaronic high priest entered the Holiest Place once a year to make propitiation for the people. The first-fruits of our nature are ascended, and so the rest is sanctified. Christ's ascension is our promotion: and whither the glory of the Head has preceded, thither the hope of the body, too, is called. We ought to keep festal day, since Christ has taken up and set in the heavens the first-fruit of our lump, that is, the human flesh [Chrysostom]. As John Baptist was Christ's forerunner on earth, so Christ is ours in heaven. <chapter eID="Heb.6"/>


<title type="x-s2">CHAPTER 7</title> <title type="x-s3"><reference osisRef="Heb.7.1-Heb.7.28">He 7:1-28</reference>. Christ's High Priesthood after the Order of Melchisedec Superior to Aaron's.</title>

<hi type="bold">1. this Melchisedec--</hi>(<reference osisRef="Heb.6.20">He 6:20</reference>; <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>). The verb does not come till <reference osisRef="Heb.7.3">He 7:3</reference>, "abideth."

<hi type="bold">king ... priest--</hi>Christ unites these offices in their highest sense, and so restores the patriarchal union of these offices.

<hi type="bold">Salem--</hi>Jerusalem, that is, seeing peace; others make Salem distinct, and to be that mentioned (<reference osisRef="Gen.33.18">Ge 33:18</reference>; <reference osisRef="John.3.23">Joh 3:23</reference>).

<hi type="bold">the most high God--</hi>called also "Possessor of heaven and earth" (<reference osisRef="Gen.14.19">Ge 14:19</reference>, <reference osisRef="Gen.14.22">22</reference>). This title of God, "the Most High," handed down by tradition from the primitive revelation, appears in the Phoenician god "Elion," that is, Most High. It is used to imply that the God whom Melchisedec served is THE TRUE God, and not one of the gods of the nations around. So it is used in the only other cases in which it is found in the New Testament, namely in the address of the demoniac, and the divining damsel constrained to confess that her own gods were false, and God the only true God.

<hi type="bold">who met Abraham--</hi>in company with the king of Sodom (<reference osisRef="Gen.14.17">Ge 14:17</reference>, <reference osisRef="Gen.14.18">18</reference>).

<hi type="bold">slaughter--</hi>perhaps defeat, as Alford translates. So <reference osisRef="Gen.14.17">Ge 14:17</reference> (compare <reference osisRef="Gen.14.15">Ge 14:15</reference>) may be translated. Arioch, king of Ellasar, lived and reigned after the disaster [Bengel]. However, if Chedorlaomer and Amraphel and Tidal were slain, though Arioch survived, "slaughter of the kings" would be correct.

<hi type="bold">blessed him--</hi>As priest he first blessed Abraham on God's part; next he blessed God on Abraham's part: a reciprocal blessing. Not a mere wish, but an authoritative and efficacious intercession as a priest. The Most High God's prerogative as "Possessor of heaven and earth," is made over to Abraham; and Abraham's glory, from his victory over the foe, is made over to God. A blessed exchange for Abraham (<reference osisRef="Gen.14.19">Ge 14:19</reference>, <reference osisRef="Gen.14.20">20</reference>).

CHAPTER 7 He 7:1-28. Christ's High Priesthood after the Order of Melchisedec Superior to Aaron's. 1. this Melchisedec-- (He 6:20; Psa 110:4). The verb does not come till He 7:3, "abideth." king... priest-- Christ unites these offices in their highest sense, and so restores the patriarchal union of these offices. Salem-- Jerusalem, that is, seeing peace; others make Salem distinct, and to be that mentioned (Ge 33:18; Joh 3:23). the most high God-- called also "Possessor of heaven and earth" (Ge 14:19, 22). This title of God, "the Most High," handed down by tradition from the primitive revelation, appears in the Phoenician god "Elion," that is, Most High. It is used to imply that the God whom Melchisedec served is THE TRUE God, and not one of the gods of the nations around. So it is used in the only other cases in which it is found in the New Testament, namely in the address of the demoniac, and the divining damsel constrained to confess that her own gods were false, and God the only true God. who met Abraham-- in company with the king of Sodom (Ge 14:17, 18). slaughter-- perhaps defeat, as Alford translates. So Ge 14:17 (compare Ge 14:15) may be translated. Arioch, king of Ellasar, lived and reigned after the disaster [Bengel]. However, if Chedorlaomer and Amraphel and Tidal were slain, though Arioch survived, "slaughter of the kings" would be correct. blessed him-- As priest he first blessed Abraham on God's part; next he blessed God on Abraham's part: a reciprocal blessing. Not a mere wish, but an authoritative and efficacious intercession as a priest. The Most High God's prerogative as "Possessor of heaven and earth," is made over to Abraham; and Abraham's glory, from his victory over the foe, is made over to God. A blessed exchange for Abraham (Ge 14:19, 20).


<hi type="bold">2. gave--</hi>Greek, "apportioned"; assigned as his portion.

<hi type="bold">tenth ... of all--</hi>namely, the booty taken. The tithes given are closely associated with the priesthood: the mediating priest received them as a pledge of the giver's whole property being God's; and as he conveyed God's gifts to man (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.1">He 7:1</reference>, "blessed him"), so also man's gifts to God. Melchisedec is a sample of how God preserves, amidst general apostasy, an elect remnant. The meeting of Melchisedec and Abraham is the connecting link between to two dispensations, the patriarchal, represented by Melchisedec, who seems to have been specially consecrated by God as a KING-PRIEST, the highest form of that primitive system in which each father of a household was priest in it, and the Levitical, represented by Abraham, in which the priesthood was to be limited to one family of one tribe and one nation. The Levitical was parenthetical, and severed the kingdom and priesthood; the patriarchal was the true forerunner of Christ's, which, like Melchisedec's, unites the kingship and priesthood, and is not derived from other man, or transmitted to other man; but derived from God, and is transmitted in God to a never-ending perpetuity. Melchisedec's priesthood continueth in Christ for ever. For other points of superiority, see <reference osisRef="Heb.7.16-Heb.7.21">He 7:16-21</reference>. Melchisedec must have had some special consecration above the other patriarchs, as Abraham, who also exercised the priesthood; else Abraham would not have paid tithe to him as to a superior. His peculiar function seems to have been, by God's special call, KING-priest whereas no other "patriarch-priest" was also a God-consecrated king.

<hi type="bold">first being--</hi>Paul begins the mystical explanation of the historical fact (allegorical explanations being familiar to JEWS), by mentioning the significancy of the name.

<hi type="bold">righteousness--</hi>not merely righteous: so Christ. Hebrew "Malchi" means king: "Tzedek," righteousness.

<hi type="bold">King of Salem--</hi>not only his own name, but that of the city which he ruled, had a typical significance, namely, peace. Christ is the true Prince of peace. The peace which He brings is the fruit of righteousness.

2. gave-- Greek, "apportioned"; assigned as his portion. tenth... of all-- namely, the booty taken. The tithes given are closely associated with the priesthood: the mediating priest received them as a pledge of the giver's whole property being God's; and as he conveyed God's gifts to man (He 7:1, "blessed him"), so also man's gifts to God. Melchisedec is a sample of how God preserves, amidst general apostasy, an elect remnant. The meeting of Melchisedec and Abraham is the connecting link between to two dispensations, the patriarchal, represented by Melchisedec, who seems to have been specially consecrated by God as a KING-PRIEST, the highest form of that primitive system in which each father of a household was priest in it, and the Levitical, represented by Abraham, in which the priesthood was to be limited to one family of one tribe and one nation. The Levitical was parenthetical, and severed the kingdom and priesthood; the patriarchal was the true forerunner of Christ's, which, like Melchisedec's, unites the kingship and priesthood, and is not derived from other man, or transmitted to other man; but derived from God, and is transmitted in God to a never-ending perpetuity. Melchisedec's priesthood continueth in Christ for ever. For other points of superiority, see He 7:16-21. Melchisedec must have had some special consecration above the other patriarchs, as Abraham, who also exercised the priesthood; else Abraham would not have paid tithe to him as to a superior. His peculiar function seems to have been, by God's special call, KING-priest whereas no other "patriarch-priest" was also a God-consecrated king. first being-- Paul begins the mystical explanation of the historical fact (allegorical explanations being familiar to JEWS), by mentioning the significancy of the name. righteousness-- not merely righteous: so Christ. Hebrew "Malchi" means king: "Tzedek," righteousness. King of Salem-- not only his own name, but that of the city which he ruled, had a typical significance, namely, peace. Christ is the true Prince of peace. The peace which He brings is the fruit of righteousness.


<hi type="bold">3. Without father, &c.--</hi>explained by "without genealogy" (so the Greek is for "without descent); compare <reference osisRef="Heb.7.6">He 7:6</reference>, that is, his genealogy is not known, whereas a Levitical priest could not dispense with the proof of his descent.

<hi type="bold">having neither beginning of days nor end of life--</hi>namely, history not having recorded his beginning nor end, as it has the beginning and end of Aaron. The Greek idiom expressed by "without father," &c., one whose parentage was humble or unknown. "Days" mean his time of discharging his function. So the eternity spoken of in <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference> is that of the priestly office chiefly.

<hi type="bold">made like--</hi>It is not said that he was asbsolutely "like." Made like, namely, in the particulars here specified. Nothing is said in Genesis of the end of his priesthood, or of his having had in his priesthood either predecessor or successor, which, in a typical point of view, represents Christ's eternal priesthood, without beginning or end. Aaron's end is recorded; Melchisedec's not: typically significant. "The Son of God" is not said to be made like unto Melchisedec, but Melchisedec to be "made like the Son of God." When Alford denies that Melchisedec was made like the Son of God in respect of his priesthood, on the ground that Melchisedec was prior in time to our Lord, he forgets that Christ's eternal priesthood was an archetypal reality in God's purpose from everlasting, to which Melchisedec's priesthood was "made like" in due time. The Son of God is the more ancient, and is the archetype: compare <reference osisRef="Heb.8.5">He 8:5</reference>, where the heavenly things are represented as the primary archetype of the Levitical ordinances. The epithets, "without father," &c. "beginning of days, "nor end," "abideth continually," belong to Melchisedec only in respect to his priesthood, and in so far as he is the type of the Son of God, and are strictly true of Him alone. Melchisedec was, in his priesthood, "made like" Christ, as far as the imperfect type could represent the lineaments of the perfect archetype. "The portrait of a living man can be seen on the canvas, yet the man is very different from his picture." There is nothing in the account, <reference osisRef="Gen.14.18-Gen.14.20">Ge 14:18-20</reference>, to mark Melchisedec as a superhuman being: he is classed with the other kings in the chapter as a living historic personage: not as Origen thought, an angel; nor as the Jews thought, Shem, son of Noah; nor as Calmet, Enoch; nor as the Melchisedekites, that he was the Holy Ghost; nor as others, the Divine Word. He was probably of Shemitic, not Canaanite origin: the last independent representative of the original Shemitic population, which had been vanquished by the Canaanites, Ham's descendants. The greatness of Abraham then lay in hopes; of Melchisedec, in present possession. Melchisedec was the highest and last representative of the Noahic covenant, as Christ was the highest and ever enduring representative of the Abrahamic. Melchisedec, like Christ, unites in himself the kingly and priestly offices, which Abraham does not. Alford thinks the epithets are, in some sense, strictly true of Melchisedec himself; not merely in the typical sense given above; but that he had not, as mortal men have, a beginning or end of life (?). A very improbable theory, and only to be resorted to in the last extremity, which has no place here. With Melchisedec, whose priesthood probably lasted a long period, the priesthood and worship of the true God in Canaan ceased. He was first and last king-priest there, till Christ, the antitype; and therefore his priesthood is said to last for ever, because it both lasts a long time, and lasts as long as the nature of the thing itself (namely, his life, and the continuance of God's worship in Canaan) admits. If Melchisedec were high priest for ever in a literal sense, then Christ and he would now still be high priests, and we should have two instead of one (!). Tholuck remarks, "Melchisedec remains in so far as the type remains in the antitype, in so far as his priesthood remains in Christ." The father and mother of Melchisedec, as also his children, are not descended from Levi, as the Levitical priests (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.6">He 7:6</reference>) were required to be, and are not even mentioned by Moses. The wife of Aaron, Elisheba, the mother from whom the Levitical priests spring, is mentioned: as also Sarah, the original mother of the Jewish nation itself. As man, Christ had no father; as God, no mother.

3. Without father, &c.-- explained by "without genealogy" (so the Greek is for "without descent); compare He 7:6, that is, his genealogy is not known, whereas a Levitical priest could not dispense with the proof of his descent. having neither beginning of days nor end of life-- namely, history not having recorded his beginning nor end, as it has the beginning and end of Aaron. The Greek idiom expressed by "without father," &c., one whose parentage was humble or unknown. "Days" mean his time of discharging his function. So the eternity spoken of in Psa 110:4 is that of the priestly office chiefly. made like-- It is not said that he was asbsolutely "like." Made like, namely, in the particulars here specified. Nothing is said in Genesis of the end of his priesthood, or of his having had in his priesthood either predecessor or successor, which, in a typical point of view, represents Christ's eternal priesthood, without beginning or end. Aaron's end is recorded; Melchisedec's not: typically significant. "The Son of God" is not said to be made like unto Melchisedec, but Melchisedec to be "made like the Son of God." When Alford denies that Melchisedec was made like the Son of God in respect of his priesthood, on the ground that Melchisedec was prior in time to our Lord, he forgets that Christ's eternal priesthood was an archetypal reality in God's purpose from everlasting, to which Melchisedec's priesthood was "made like" in due time. The Son of God is the more ancient, and is the archetype: compare He 8:5, where the heavenly things are represented as the primary archetype of the Levitical ordinances. The epithets, "without father," &c. "beginning of days, "nor end," "abideth continually," belong to Melchisedec only in respect to his priesthood, and in so far as he is the type of the Son of God, and are strictly true of Him alone. Melchisedec was, in his priesthood, "made like" Christ, as far as the imperfect type could represent the lineaments of the perfect archetype. "The portrait of a living man can be seen on the canvas, yet the man is very different from his picture." There is nothing in the account, Ge 14:18-20, to mark Melchisedec as a superhuman being: he is classed with the other kings in the chapter as a living historic personage: not as Origen thought, an angel; nor as the Jews thought, Shem, son of Noah; nor as Calmet, Enoch; nor as the Melchisedekites, that he was the Holy Ghost; nor as others, the Divine Word. He was probably of Shemitic, not Canaanite origin: the last independent representative of the original Shemitic population, which had been vanquished by the Canaanites, Ham's descendants. The greatness of Abraham then lay in hopes; of Melchisedec, in present possession. Melchisedec was the highest and last representative of the Noahic covenant, as Christ was the highest and ever enduring representative of the Abrahamic. Melchisedec, like Christ, unites in himself the kingly and priestly offices, which Abraham does not. Alford thinks the epithets are, in some sense, strictly true of Melchisedec himself; not merely in the typical sense given above; but that he had not, as mortal men have, a beginning or end of life (?). A very improbable theory, and only to be resorted to in the last extremity, which has no place here. With Melchisedec, whose priesthood probably lasted a long period, the priesthood and worship of the true God in Canaan ceased. He was first and last king-priest there, till Christ, the antitype; and therefore his priesthood is said to last for ever, because it both lasts a long time, and lasts as long as the nature of the thing itself (namely, his life, and the continuance of God's worship in Canaan) admits. If Melchisedec were high priest for ever in a literal sense, then Christ and he would now still be high priests, and we should have two instead of one (!). Tholuck remarks, "Melchisedec remains in so far as the type remains in the antitype, in so far as his priesthood remains in Christ." The father and mother of Melchisedec, as also his children, are not descended from Levi, as the Levitical priests (He 7:6) were required to be, and are not even mentioned by Moses. The wife of Aaron, Elisheba, the mother from whom the Levitical priests spring, is mentioned: as also Sarah, the original mother of the Jewish nation itself. As man, Christ had no father; as God, no mother.


<hi type="bold">4. consider--</hi>not merely see, but weigh with attentive contemplation, the fact.

<hi type="bold">even--</hi>"to whom (as his superior) Abraham even paid tithe (went so far as to pay tithe) of (consisting of, literally, 'from') the best of the spoils (literally, 'the top of the heap"; whether of corn, the first-fruits of which, taken from the top, used to be consecrated to God; or of spoils, from the top of which the general used to take some portion for consecration to God, or for his own use)." He paid "tithes of ALL," and those tithes were taken out of the topmost and best portion of the whole spoils.

<hi type="bold">the patriarch--</hi>in the Greek emphatically standing at the end of the whole sentence: And this payer of tithe being no less a personage than "the patriarch," the first forefather and head of our Jewish race and nation See on <reference osisRef="Heb.7.3">He 7:3</reference>, on Melchisedec's superiority as specially consecrated king-priest, above the other patriarch-priests.

4. consider-- not merely see, but weigh with attentive contemplation, the fact. even-- "to whom (as his superior) Abraham even paid tithe (went so far as to pay tithe) of (consisting of, literally, 'from') the best of the spoils (literally, 'the top of the heap"; whether of corn, the first-fruits of which, taken from the top, used to be consecrated to God; or of spoils, from the top of which the general used to take some portion for consecration to God, or for his own use)." He paid "tithes of ALL," and those tithes were taken out of the topmost and best portion of the whole spoils. the patriarch-- in the Greek emphatically standing at the end of the whole sentence: And this payer of tithe being no less a personage than "the patriarch," the first forefather and head of our Jewish race and nation See on He 7:3, on Melchisedec's superiority as specially consecrated king-priest, above the other patriarch-priests.


<hi type="bold">5. sons of Levi--</hi>namely, those alone who belonged to the family of Aaron, to whom the priesthood was restricted. Tithes originally paid to the whole tribe of Levi, became at length attached to the priesthood.

<hi type="bold">according to the law--</hi>sanctioned by Jehovah (<reference osisRef="Heb.9.19">He 9:19</reference>).

<hi type="bold">of their brethren--</hi>with whom, in point of natural descent, they are on a level.

<hi type="bold">though, &c.--</hi>Though thus on a level by common descent from Abraham, they yet pay tithe to the Levites, whose brethren they are. Now the Levites are subordinate to the priests; and these again to Abraham, their common progenitor; and Abraham to Melchisedec. "How great" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.4">He 7:4</reference>) then, must this Melchisedec be in respect to his priesthood, as compared with the Levitical, though the latter received tithes! and now unspeakably great must "the Son of God" be, to whom, as the sacerdotal archetype (in God's purpose), Melchisedec was made like! Thus compare the "consider," <reference osisRef="Heb.7.4">He 7:4</reference>, in the case of Melchisedec, the type, with the "consider" (Greek, "contemplate attentively," see on <reference osisRef="Heb.3.1">He 3:1</reference>, a stronger word than here) in the case of Christ, the archetype.

5. sons of Levi-- namely, those alone who belonged to the family of Aaron, to whom the priesthood was restricted. Tithes originally paid to the whole tribe of Levi, became at length attached to the priesthood. according to the law-- sanctioned by Jehovah (He 9:19). of their brethren-- with whom, in point of natural descent, they are on a level. though, &c.-- Though thus on a level by common descent from Abraham, they yet pay tithe to the Levites, whose brethren they are. Now the Levites are subordinate to the priests; and these again to Abraham, their common progenitor; and Abraham to Melchisedec. "How great" (He 7:4) then, must this Melchisedec be in respect to his priesthood, as compared with the Levitical, though the latter received tithes! and now unspeakably great must "the Son of God" be, to whom, as the sacerdotal archetype (in God's purpose), Melchisedec was made like! Thus compare the "consider," He 7:4, in the case of Melchisedec, the type, with the "consider" (Greek, "contemplate attentively," see on He 3:1, a stronger word than here) in the case of Christ, the archetype.


<hi type="bold">6. he whose descent is not counted from them--</hi>not from "the sons of Levi," as those "who receive the priesthood." This verse explains "without descent" (Greek, "genealogy" in both verses, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.3">He 7:3</reference>). He who needs not, as the Levitical priests, to be able to trace his genealogy back to Levi.

<hi type="bold">received--</hi>Greek, "hath received tithes."

<hi type="bold">blessed--</hi>Greek, "hath blessed." The perfect tense implies that the significance of the fact endures to the present time.

<hi type="bold">him that had--</hi>"the possessor of the promises," Abraham's peculiar distinction and designation. Paul exalts Abraham in order still more to exalt Melchisedec. When Christ is the subject, the singular "promise" is used. "The promises" in the plural, refer to God's promise of greatness to himself and his seed, and of the possession of Canaan, twice repeated before the blessing of Melchisedec. As the priests, though above the people (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.7">He 7:7</reference>) whom it was their duty to "bless," were yet subordinate to Abraham; and as Abraham was subordinate to Melchisedec, who blessed him, Melchisedec must be much above the Levitical priests.

6. he whose descent is not counted from them-- not from "the sons of Levi," as those "who receive the priesthood." This verse explains "without descent" (Greek, "genealogy" in both verses, He 7:3). He who needs not, as the Levitical priests, to be able to trace his genealogy back to Levi. received-- Greek, "hath received tithes." blessed-- Greek, "hath blessed." The perfect tense implies that the significance of the fact endures to the present time. him that had-- "the possessor of the promises," Abraham's peculiar distinction and designation. Paul exalts Abraham in order still more to exalt Melchisedec. When Christ is the subject, the singular "promise" is used. "The promises" in the plural, refer to God's promise of greatness to himself and his seed, and of the possession of Canaan, twice repeated before the blessing of Melchisedec. As the priests, though above the people (He 7:7) whom it was their duty to "bless," were yet subordinate to Abraham; and as Abraham was subordinate to Melchisedec, who blessed him, Melchisedec must be much above the Levitical priests.


7. The principle that the blesser is superior to him whom he blesses, holds good only in a blessing given with divine authority; not merely a prayerful wish, but one that is divinely efficient in working its purport, as that of the patriarchs on their children: so Christ's blessing, <reference osisRef="Luke.24.51">Lu 24:51</reference>; <reference osisRef="Acts.3.26">Ac 3:26</reference>.

7. The principle that the blesser is superior to him whom he blesses, holds good only in a blessing given with divine authority; not merely a prayerful wish, but one that is divinely efficient in working its purport, as that of the patriarchs on their children: so Christ's blessing, Lu 24:51; Ac 3:26.


8. Second point of superiority: Melchisedec's is an enduring, the Levitical a transitory, priesthood. As the law was a parenthesis between Abraham's dispensation of promise of grace, and its enduring fulfilment at Christ's coming (<reference osisRef="Rom.5.20">Ro 5:20</reference>, Greek, "The law entered as something adscititious and by the way"): so the Levitical priesthood was parenthetical and temporary, between Melchisedec's typically enduring priesthood, and its antitypical realization in our ever continuing High Priest, Christ.

<hi type="bold">here--</hi>in the Levitical priesthood.

<hi type="bold">there--</hi>in the priesthood after the order of Melchisedec. In order to bring out the typical parallel more strongly, Paul substitutes, "He of whom it is witnessed that he liveth," for the more untypical, "He who is made like to Him that liveth." Melchisedec "liveth" merely in his official capacity, his priesthood being continued in Christ. Christ, on the other hand, is, in His own person, "ever living after the power of an endless life" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.16">He 7:16</reference>, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.25">25</reference>). Melchisedec's death not being recorded, is expressed by the positive term "liveth," for the sake of bringing into prominence the antitype, Christ, of whom alone it is strictly and perfectly true, "that He liveth."

8. Second point of superiority: Melchisedec's is an enduring, the Levitical a transitory, priesthood. As the law was a parenthesis between Abraham's dispensation of promise of grace, and its enduring fulfilment at Christ's coming (Ro 5:20, Greek, "The law entered as something adscititious and by the way"): so the Levitical priesthood was parenthetical and temporary, between Melchisedec's typically enduring priesthood, and its antitypical realization in our ever continuing High Priest, Christ. here-- in the Levitical priesthood. there-- in the priesthood after the order of Melchisedec. In order to bring out the typical parallel more strongly, Paul substitutes, "He of whom it is witnessed that he liveth," for the more untypical, "He who is made like to Him that liveth." Melchisedec "liveth" merely in his official capacity, his priesthood being continued in Christ. Christ, on the other hand, is, in His own person, "ever living after the power of an endless life" (He 7:16, 25). Melchisedec's death not being recorded, is expressed by the positive term "liveth," for the sake of bringing into prominence the antitype, Christ, of whom alone it is strictly and perfectly true, "that He liveth."


<hi type="bold">9. as I may so say--</hi>to preclude what he is about to say being taken in the mere literal sense; I may say that, virtually, Levi, in the person of his father Abraham, acknowledged Melchisedec's superiority, and paid tithes to him.

<hi type="bold">who receiveth tithes--</hi>(Compare <reference osisRef="Heb.7.5">He 7:5</reference>).

<hi type="bold">in Abraham--</hi>Greek, "by means of (by the hand of) Abraham"; through Abraham. "Paid tithes," literally, "hath been tithed," that is, been taken tithes of.

9. as I may so say-- to preclude what he is about to say being taken in the mere literal sense; I may say that, virtually, Levi, in the person of his father Abraham, acknowledged Melchisedec's superiority, and paid tithes to him. who receiveth tithes-- (Compare He 7:5). in Abraham-- Greek, "by means of (by the hand of) Abraham"; through Abraham. "Paid tithes," literally, "hath been tithed," that is, been taken tithes of.


<hi type="bold">10. in the loins of his father--</hi>that is, forefather Abraham. Christ did not, in this sense, pay tithes in Abraham, for He never was in the loins of an earthly father [Alford]. Though, in respect to His mother, He was "of the fruit of (David's, and so of) Abraham's loins," yet, being supernaturally, without human father, conceived, as He is above the natural law of birth, so is he above the law of tithes. Only those born in the natural way, and so in sin, being under the curse, needed to pay tithe to the priest, that he might make propitiation for their sin. Not so Christ, who derived only His flesh, not also the taint of the flesh, from Abraham. Bengel remarks, The blessings which Abraham had before meeting Melchisedec were the general promises, and the special one of a natural seed, and so of Levi; but the promises under which Christ was comprehended, and the faith for which Abraham was so commended, followed after Abraham's meeting Melchisedec, and being blessed by him: to which fact. <reference osisRef="Gen.15.1">Ge 15:1</reference>, "After these things," calls our attention. This explains why Christ, the supernatural seed, is not included as paying tithes through Abraham to Melchisedec.

10. in the loins of his father-- that is, forefather Abraham. Christ did not, in this sense, pay tithes in Abraham, for He never was in the loins of an earthly father [Alford]. Though, in respect to His mother, He was "of the fruit of (David's, and so of) Abraham's loins," yet, being supernaturally, without human father, conceived, as He is above the natural law of birth, so is he above the law of tithes. Only those born in the natural way, and so in sin, being under the curse, needed to pay tithe to the priest, that he might make propitiation for their sin. Not so Christ, who derived only His flesh, not also the taint of the flesh, from Abraham. Bengel remarks, The blessings which Abraham had before meeting Melchisedec were the general promises, and the special one of a natural seed, and so of Levi; but the promises under which Christ was comprehended, and the faith for which Abraham was so commended, followed after Abraham's meeting Melchisedec, and being blessed by him: to which fact. Ge 15:1, "After these things," calls our attention. This explains why Christ, the supernatural seed, is not included as paying tithes through Abraham to Melchisedec.


<hi type="bold">11. perfection--</hi>absolute: "the bringing of man to his highest state, namely, that of salvation and sanctification."

<hi type="bold">under it--</hi>The reading in the oldest manuscripts is, "Upon it (that is, on the ground of it as the basis, the priest having to administer the law, Mal 2:7: it being presupposed) the people (<reference osisRef="Heb.9.19">He 9:19</reference>, 'all the people') have received the law (the Greek is perfect, not aorist tense; implying the people were still observing the law)."

<hi type="bold">what further need--</hi>(<reference osisRef="Heb.8.7">He 8:7</reference>). For God does nothing needless.

<hi type="bold">another--</hi>rather as Greek, "that a different priest (one of a different order) should arise (anew, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.15">He 7:15</reference>).

<hi type="bold">not be called--</hi>Greek, "not be said (to be) after the order of Aaron," that is, that, when spoken of in the <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>, "He is not said to be (as we should expect, if the Aaronic priesthood was perfect) after the order of Aaron."

11. perfection-- absolute: "the bringing of man to his highest state, namely, that of salvation and sanctification." under it-- The reading in the oldest manuscripts is, "Upon it (that is, on the ground of it as the basis, the priest having to administer the law, Mal 2:7: it being presupposed) the people (He 9:19, 'all the people') have received the law (the Greek is perfect, not aorist tense; implying the people were still observing the law)." what further need-- (He 8:7). For God does nothing needless. another-- rather as Greek, "that a different priest (one of a different order) should arise (anew, He 7:15). not be called-- Greek, "not be said (to be) after the order of Aaron," that is, that, when spoken of in the Psa 110:4, "He is not said to be (as we should expect, if the Aaronic priesthood was perfect) after the order of Aaron."


<hi type="bold">12. For--</hi>the reason why Paul presses the words "after the order of Melchisedec" in <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>, namely, because these presuppose a change or transference of the priesthood, and this carries with it a change also of the law (which is inseparably bound up with the priesthood, both stand and fall together, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.11">He 7:11</reference>). This is his answer to those who might object, What need was there of a new covenant?

12. For-- the reason why Paul presses the words "after the order of Melchisedec" in Psa 110:4, namely, because these presuppose a change or transference of the priesthood, and this carries with it a change also of the law (which is inseparably bound up with the priesthood, both stand and fall together, He 7:11). This is his answer to those who might object, What need was there of a new covenant?


13. Confirming the truth that a change is made of the law (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.12">He 7:12</reference>), by another fact showing the distinctness of the new priesthood from the Aaronic.

<hi type="bold">these things--</hi>(<reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>).

<hi type="bold">pertaineth--</hi>Greek, "hath partaken of" (the perfect tense implies the continuance still of His manhood).

<hi type="bold">another--</hi>"a different tribe" from that of Levi.

13. Confirming the truth that a change is made of the law (He 7:12), by another fact showing the distinctness of the new priesthood from the Aaronic. these things-- (Psa 110:4). pertaineth-- Greek, "hath partaken of" (the perfect tense implies the continuance still of His manhood). another-- "a different tribe" from that of Levi.


<hi type="bold">14. evident--</hi>literally, "manifest before the eyes" as a thing indisputable; a proof that whatever difficulties may now appear, then Jesus Christ's genealogy labored under none.

<hi type="bold">our Lord--</hi>the only place where this now common title occurs without "Jesus," or "Christ," except <reference osisRef="2Pet.3.15">2Pe 3:15</reference>.

<hi type="bold">sprang--</hi>as a plant, and a branch.

<hi type="bold">Judah--</hi><reference osisRef="Gen.49.10">Ge 49:10</reference>; <reference osisRef="Luke.1.27">Lu 1:27</reference>, 39 (Hebron of Judah, where Lightfoot thinks Jesus was conceived) <reference osisRef="Luke.2.4">Lu 2:4</reference>, <reference osisRef="2Cor.2.5">5</reference>; <reference osisRef="Rev.5.5">Re 5:5</reference>.

<hi type="bold">of which tribe ... priesthood--</hi>"in respect to which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priests" (so the oldest manuscripts read, nothing to imply that priests were to be taken from it).

14. evident-- literally, "manifest before the eyes" as a thing indisputable; a proof that whatever difficulties may now appear, then Jesus Christ's genealogy labored under none. our Lord-- the only place where this now common title occurs without "Jesus," or "Christ," except 2Pe 3:15. sprang-- as a plant, and a branch. Judah-- Ge 49:10; Lu 1:27, 39 (Hebron of Judah, where Lightfoot thinks Jesus was conceived) Lu 2:4, 5; Re 5:5. of which tribe... priesthood-- "in respect to which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priests" (so the oldest manuscripts read, nothing to imply that priests were to be taken from it).


15. Another proof that the law, or economy, is changed, namely, forasmuch as Christ is appointed Priest, "not according to the law of a carnal (that is, a mere outward) commandment," but "according to the power of an indissoluble (so the Greek) life." The hundred tenth Psalm appoints Him "for ever" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.17">He 7:17</reference>). The Levitical law required a definite carnal descent. In contrast stands "the power"; Christ's spiritual, inward, living power of overcoming death. Not agreeably to a statute is Christ appointed, but according to an inward living power.

<hi type="bold">it--</hi>the change of the law or economy, the statement (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.12">He 7:12</reference>, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.18">18</reference>).

<hi type="bold">far more--</hi>Greek, "more abundantly."

<hi type="bold">for that--</hi>"seeing that," literally, "if"; so <reference osisRef="Rom.5.10">Ro 5:10</reference>.

<hi type="bold">after the similitude of Melchisedec--</hi>answering to "after the order of Melchisedec" (<reference osisRef="Heb.5.10">He 5:10</reference>). The "order" cannot mean a series of priests, for Melchisedec neither received his priesthood from, nor transmitted it to, any other mere man; it must mean "answering to the office of Melchisedec." Christ's priesthood is similar to Melchisedec's in that it is "for ever" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.16">He 7:16</reference>, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.17">17</reference>).

<hi type="bold">another--</hi>rather as Greek, "a different."

15. Another proof that the law, or economy, is changed, namely, forasmuch as Christ is appointed Priest, "not according to the law of a carnal (that is, a mere outward) commandment," but "according to the power of an indissoluble (so the Greek) life." The hundred tenth Psalm appoints Him "for ever" (He 7:17). The Levitical law required a definite carnal descent. In contrast stands "the power"; Christ's spiritual, inward, living power of overcoming death. Not agreeably to a statute is Christ appointed, but according to an inward living power. it-- the change of the law or economy, the statement (He 7:12, 18). far more-- Greek, "more abundantly." for that-- "seeing that," literally, "if"; so Ro 5:10. after the similitude of Melchisedec-- answering to "after the order of Melchisedec" (He 5:10). The "order" cannot mean a series of priests, for Melchisedec neither received his priesthood from, nor transmitted it to, any other mere man; it must mean "answering to the office of Melchisedec." Christ's priesthood is similar to Melchisedec's in that it is "for ever" (He 7:16, 17). another-- rather as Greek, "a different."


<hi type="bold">16. carnal ... endless--</hi>mutually contrasted. As "form" and "power" are opposed, <reference osisRef="2Tim.3.5">2Ti 3:5</reference>; so here "the law" and "power," compare <reference osisRef="Rom.8.3">Ro 8:3</reference>, "The law was weak through the flesh"; and <reference osisRef="Heb.7.18">He 7:18</reference>, "weakness." "The law" is here not the law in general, but the statute as to the priesthood. "Carnal," as being only outward and temporary, is contrasted with "endless," or, as Greek, "indissoluble." Commandments is contrasted with "life." The law can give a commandment, but it cannot give life (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.19">He 7:19</reference>). But our High Priest's inherent "power," now in heaven, has in Him "life for ever"; <reference osisRef="Heb.9.14">He 9:14</reference>, "through the eternal Spirit"; <reference osisRef="Heb.7.25">He 7:25</reference>, "able ... ever liveth" (<reference osisRef="John.5.26">Joh 5:26</reference>). It is in the power of His resurrection life, not of His earthly life, that Christ officiates as a Priest.

16. carnal... endless-- mutually contrasted. As "form" and "power" are opposed, 2Ti 3:5; so here "the law" and "power," compare Ro 8:3, "The law was weak through the flesh"; and He 7:18, "weakness." "The law" is here not the law in general, but the statute as to the priesthood. "Carnal," as being only outward and temporary, is contrasted with "endless," or, as Greek, "indissoluble." Commandments is contrasted with "life." The law can give a commandment, but it cannot give life (He 7:19). But our High Priest's inherent "power," now in heaven, has in Him "life for ever"; He 9:14, "through the eternal Spirit"; He 7:25, "able... ever liveth" (Joh 5:26). It is in the power of His resurrection life, not of His earthly life, that Christ officiates as a Priest.


<hi type="bold">17. For--</hi>proving His life to be "endless" or indissoluble (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.16">He 7:16</reference>). The emphasis is on "for ever." The oldest manuscripts read, "He is testified of, that Thou art," &c.

17. For-- proving His life to be "endless" or indissoluble (He 7:16). The emphasis is on "for ever." The oldest manuscripts read, "He is testified of, that Thou art," &c.


<hi type="bold">18. there is--</hi>Greek, "there takes place," according to <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>.

<hi type="bold">disannuling--</hi>a repealing.

<hi type="bold">of the commandment--</hi>ordaining the Levitical priesthood. And, as the Levitical priesthood and the law are inseparably joined, since the former is repealed, the latter is so also (see on <reference osisRef="Heb.7.11">He 7:11</reference>).

<hi type="bold">going before--</hi>the legal ordinance introducing and giving place to the Christian, the antitypical and permanent end of the former.

<hi type="bold">weakness and unprofitableness--</hi>The opposite of "power" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.16">He 7:16</reference>).

18. there is-- Greek, "there takes place," according to Psa 110:4. disannuling-- a repealing. of the commandment-- ordaining the Levitical priesthood. And, as the Levitical priesthood and the law are inseparably joined, since the former is repealed, the latter is so also (see on He 7:11). going before-- the legal ordinance introducing and giving place to the Christian, the antitypical and permanent end of the former. weakness and unprofitableness-- The opposite of "power" (He 7:16).


<hi type="bold">19. For, &c.--</hi>justifying his calling the law weak and unprofitable (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.18">He 7:18</reference>). The law could not bring men to: true justification or sanctification before God, which is the "perfection" that we all need in order to be accepted of Him, and which we have in Christ.

<hi type="bold">nothing--</hi>not merely "no one," but "nothing." The law brought nothing to its perfected end; everything in it was introductory to its antitype in the Christian economy, which realizes the perfection contemplated; compare "unprofitableness," <reference osisRef="Heb.7.18">He 7:18</reference>.

<hi type="bold">did--</hi>rather connect with <reference osisRef="Heb.7.18">He 7:18</reference>, thus, "There takes place (by virtue of <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>) a repealing of the commandment (on the one hand), but (on the other) a bringing in afterwards (the Greek expresses that there is a bringing in of something over and above the law; a superinducing, or accession of something new, namely, something better than the good things which the pre-existing law promised [Wahl]) of a better hope," not one weak and unprofitable, but, as elsewhere the Christian dispensation is called, "everlasting," "true," "the second," "more excellent," "different," "living," "new," "to come," "perfect." Compare <reference osisRef="Heb.8.6">He 8:6</reference>, bringing us near to God, now in spirit, hereafter both in spirit and in body.

<hi type="bold">we draw nigh unto God--</hi>the sure token of "perfection." Weakness is the opposite of this filial confidence of access. The access through the legal sacrifices was only symbolical and through the medium of a priest; that through Christ is immediate, perfect, and spiritual.

19. For, &c.-- justifying his calling the law weak and unprofitable (He 7:18). The law could not bring men to: true justification or sanctification before God, which is the "perfection" that we all need in order to be accepted of Him, and which we have in Christ. nothing-- not merely "no one," but "nothing." The law brought nothing to its perfected end; everything in it was introductory to its antitype in the Christian economy, which realizes the perfection contemplated; compare "unprofitableness," He 7:18. did-- rather connect with He 7:18, thus, "There takes place (by virtue of Psa 110:4) a repealing of the commandment (on the one hand), but (on the other) a bringing in afterwards (the Greek expresses that there is a bringing in of something over and above the law; a superinducing, or accession of something new, namely, something better than the good things which the pre-existing law promised [Wahl]) of a better hope," not one weak and unprofitable, but, as elsewhere the Christian dispensation is called, "everlasting," "true," "the second," "more excellent," "different," "living," "new," "to come," "perfect." Compare He 8:6, bringing us near to God, now in spirit, hereafter both in spirit and in body. we draw nigh unto God-- the sure token of "perfection." Weakness is the opposite of this filial confidence of access. The access through the legal sacrifices was only symbolical and through the medium of a priest; that through Christ is immediate, perfect, and spiritual.


20. Another proof of the superiority of Christ's Melchisedec-like priesthood; the oath of God gave a solemn weight to it which was not in the law-priesthood, which was not so confirmed.

<hi type="bold">he was made priest--</hi>rather supply from <reference osisRef="Heb.7.22">He 7:22</reference>, which completes the sentence begun in this verse, <reference osisRef="Heb.7.21">He 7:21</reference> being a parenthesis, "inasmuch as not without an oath He was made surety of the testament (for, &c.), of so much better a testament hath Jesus been made the surety." 21. Translate in the Greek order, "For they indeed (the existing legal priests) without the (solemn) promise on oath (so the Greek [Tittmann]) are made priests."

<hi type="bold">by him--</hi>God.

<hi type="bold">unto him--</hi>the Lord, the Son of God (<reference osisRef="Ps.110.1">Psa 110:1</reference>).

<hi type="bold">not repent--</hi>never change His purpose.

<hi type="bold">after the order of Melchisedec--</hi>omitted in some oldest manuscripts, contained in others.

20. Another proof of the superiority of Christ's Melchisedec-like priesthood; the oath of God gave a solemn weight to it which was not in the law-priesthood, which was not so confirmed. he was made priest-- rather supply from He 7:22, which completes the sentence begun in this verse, He 7:21 being a parenthesis, "inasmuch as not without an oath He was made surety of the testament (for, &c.), of so much better a testament hath Jesus been made the surety." 21. Translate in the Greek order, "For they indeed (the existing legal priests) without the (solemn) promise on oath (so the Greek [Tittmann]) are made priests." by him-- God. unto him-- the Lord, the Son of God (Psa 110:1). not repent-- never change His purpose. after the order of Melchisedec-- omitted in some oldest manuscripts, contained in others.


<hi type="bold">22. surety--</hi>ensuring in His own person the certainty of the covenant to us. This He did by becoming responsible for our guilt, by sealing the covenant with His blood, and by being openly acknowledged as our triumphant Saviour by the Father, who raised Him from the dead. Thus He is at once God's surety for man, and man's surety for God, and so Mediator between God and man (<reference osisRef="Heb.8.6">He 8:6</reference>).

<hi type="bold">better--</hi><reference osisRef="Heb.8.6">He 8:6</reference>; <reference osisRef="Heb.13.20">13:20</reference>, "everlasting."

<hi type="bold">testament--</hi>sometimes translated, "covenant." The Greek term implies that it is appointed by God, and comprises the relations and bearings partly of a covenant, partly of a testament: (1) the appointment made without the concurrence of a second party, of somewhat concerning that second party; a last will or testament, so in <reference osisRef="Heb.9.16">He 9:16</reference>, <reference osisRef="Heb.9.17">17</reference>; (<reference osisRef="2Cor.9.2">2</reference>) a mutual agreement in which both parties consent.

22. surety-- ensuring in His own person the certainty of the covenant to us. This He did by becoming responsible for our guilt, by sealing the covenant with His blood, and by being openly acknowledged as our triumphant Saviour by the Father, who raised Him from the dead. Thus He is at once God's surety for man, and man's surety for God, and so Mediator between God and man (He 8:6). better-- He 8:6; 13:20, "everlasting." testament-- sometimes translated, "covenant." The Greek term implies that it is appointed by God, and comprises the relations and bearings partly of a covenant, partly of a testament: (1) the appointment made without the concurrence of a second party, of somewhat concerning that second party; a last will or testament, so in He 9:16, 17; (2) a mutual agreement in which both parties consent.


23. Another proof of superiority; the Levitical priests were many, as death caused the need of continually new ones being appointed in succession. Christ dies not, and so hath a priesthood which passes not from one to another.

<hi type="bold">were--</hi>Greek, "are made."

<hi type="bold">many--</hi>one after another; opposed to His "unchangeable (that does not pass from one to another) priesthood" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.24">He 7:24</reference>).

<hi type="bold">not suffered to continue--</hi>Greek, "hindered from permanently continuing," namely, in the priesthood.

23. Another proof of superiority; the Levitical priests were many, as death caused the need of continually new ones being appointed in succession. Christ dies not, and so hath a priesthood which passes not from one to another. were-- Greek, "are made." many-- one after another; opposed to His "unchangeable (that does not pass from one to another) priesthood" (He 7:24). not suffered to continue-- Greek, "hindered from permanently continuing," namely, in the priesthood.


<hi type="bold">24. he--</hi>emphatic; Greek, "Himself." So in <reference osisRef="Ps.110.4">Psa 110:4</reference>, "Thou art a priest"; singular, not priests, "many."

<hi type="bold">continueth--</hi>Greek, simple verb, not the compound as in <reference osisRef="Heb.7.23">He 7:23</reference>. "Remaineth," namely, in life.

<hi type="bold">unchangeable--</hi>Greek, "hath His priesthood unchangeable"; not passing from one to another, intransmissible. Therefore no earthly so-called apostolic succession of priests are His vicegerents. The Jewish priests had successors in office, because "they could not continue by reason of death." But this Man, because He liveth ever, hath no successor in office, not even Peter (<reference osisRef="1Pet.5.1">1Pe 5:1</reference>).

24. he-- emphatic; Greek, "Himself." So in Psa 110:4, "Thou art a priest"; singular, not priests, "many." continueth-- Greek, simple verb, not the compound as in He 7:23. "Remaineth," namely, in life. unchangeable-- Greek, "hath His priesthood unchangeable"; not passing from one to another, intransmissible. Therefore no earthly so-called apostolic succession of priests are His vicegerents. The Jewish priests had successors in office, because "they could not continue by reason of death." But this Man, because He liveth ever, hath no successor in office, not even Peter (1Pe 5:1).


<hi type="bold">25. Wherefore--</hi>Greek, "Whence"; inasmuch as "He remaineth for ever."

<hi type="bold">also--</hi>as a natural consequence flowing from the last, at the same time a new and higher thing [Alford].

<hi type="bold">save--</hi>His very name Jesus (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.22">He 7:22</reference>) meaning Saviour.

<hi type="bold">to the uttermost--</hi>altogether, perfectly, so that nothing should be wanting afterwards for ever [Tittmann]. It means "in any wise," "utterly," in <reference osisRef="Luke.13.11">Lu 13:11</reference>.

<hi type="bold">come unto God--</hi>by faith.

<hi type="bold">by him--</hi>through Him as their mediating Priest, instead of through the Levitical priests.

<hi type="bold">seeing he ever liveth--</hi>resuming "He continueth ever," <reference osisRef="Heb.7.24">He 7:24</reference>; therefore "He is able to the uttermost"; He is not, like the Levitical priest, prevented by death, for "He ever liveth" (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.23">He 7:23</reference>).

<hi type="bold">to make intercession--</hi>There was but the one offering on earth once for all. But the intercession for us in the heavens (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.26">He 7:26</reference>) is ever continuing, whence the result follows, that we can never be separated from the love of God in Christ. He intercedes only for those who come unto God through Him, not for the unbelieving world (<reference osisRef="John.17.9">Joh 17:9</reference>). As samples of His intercession, compare the prophetical descriptions in the Old Testament. "By an humble omnipotency (for it was by His humiliation that He obtained all power), or omnipotent humility, appearing in the presence, and presenting His postulations at the throne of God" [Bishop Pearson]. He was not only the offering, but the priest who offered it. Therefore, He has become not only a sacrifice, but an intercessor; His intercession being founded on His voluntary offering of Himself without spot to God. We are not only then in virtue of His sacrifice forgiven, but in virtue of the intercession admitted to favor and grace [Archbishop Magee].

25. Wherefore-- Greek, "Whence"; inasmuch as "He remaineth for ever." also-- as a natural consequence flowing from the last, at the same time a new and higher thing [Alford]. save-- His very name Jesus (He 7:22) meaning Saviour. to the uttermost-- altogether, perfectly, so that nothing should be wanting afterwards for ever [Tittmann]. It means "in any wise," "utterly," in Lu 13:11. come unto God-- by faith. by him-- through Him as their mediating Priest, instead of through the Levitical priests. seeing he ever liveth-- resuming "He continueth ever," He 7:24; therefore "He is able to the uttermost"; He is not, like the Levitical priest, prevented by death, for "He ever liveth" (He 7:23). to make intercession-- There was but the one offering on earth once for all. But the intercession for us in the heavens (He 7:26) is ever continuing, whence the result follows, that we can never be separated from the love of God in Christ. He intercedes only for those who come unto God through Him, not for the unbelieving world (Joh 17:9). As samples of His intercession, compare the prophetical descriptions in the Old Testament. "By an humble omnipotency (for it was by His humiliation that He obtained all power), or omnipotent humility, appearing in the presence, and presenting His postulations at the throne of God" [Bishop Pearson]. He was not only the offering, but the priest who offered it. Therefore, He has become not only a sacrifice, but an intercessor; His intercession being founded on His voluntary offering of Himself without spot to God. We are not only then in virtue of His sacrifice forgiven, but in virtue of the intercession admitted to favor and grace [Archbishop Magee].


<hi type="bold">26. such--</hi>as is above described. The oldest manuscripts read, "also." "For to US (as sinners; emphatical) there was also becoming (besides the other excellencies of our High Priest) such an High Priest."

<hi type="bold">holy--</hi>"pious" (a distinct Greek word from that for holy, which latter implies consecration) towards God; perfectly answering God's will in reverent piety (<reference osisRef="Ps.16.10">Psa 16:10</reference>).

<hi type="bold">harmless--</hi>literally, "free from evil" and guile, in relation to Himself.

<hi type="bold">undefiled--</hi>not defiled by stain contracted from others, in relation to men. Temptation, to which He was exposed, left no trace of evil in Him.

<hi type="bold">separate--</hi>rather, "separated from sinners," namely, in His heavenly state as our High Priest above, after He had been parted from the earth, as the Levitical high priest was separated from the people in the sanctuary (whence he was not to go out), <reference osisRef="Lev.21.12">Le 21:12</reference>. Though justifying through faith the ungodly, He hath no contact with them as such. He is lifted above our sinful community, being "made higher than the heavens," at the same time that He makes believers as such (not as sinners), "to sit together (with Him) in heavenly places" (<reference osisRef="Eph.2.6">Ep 2:6</reference>). Just as Moses on the mount was separated from and above the people, and alone with God. This proves Jesus is God. "Though innumerable lies have been forged against the venerable Jesus, none dared to charge Him with any intemperance" [Origen].

<hi type="bold">made--</hi>Jesus was higher before (<reference osisRef="John.17.5">Joh 17:5</reference>), and as the God-MAN was made so by the Father after His humiliation (compare <reference osisRef="Heb.1.4">He 1:4</reference>).

<hi type="bold">higher than the heavens--</hi>for "He passed through [so the Greek] the heavens" (<reference osisRef="Heb.4.14">He 4:14</reference>).

26. such-- as is above described. The oldest manuscripts read, "also." "For to US (as sinners; emphatical) there was also becoming (besides the other excellencies of our High Priest) such an High Priest." holy-- "pious" (a distinct Greek word from that for holy, which latter implies consecration) towards God; perfectly answering God's will in reverent piety (Psa 16:10). harmless-- literally, "free from evil" and guile, in relation to Himself. undefiled-- not defiled by stain contracted from others, in relation to men. Temptation, to which He was exposed, left no trace of evil in Him. separate-- rather, "separated from sinners," namely, in His heavenly state as our High Priest above, after He had been parted from the earth, as the Levitical high priest was separated from the people in the sanctuary (whence he was not to go out), Le 21:12. Though justifying through faith the ungodly, He hath no contact with them as such. He is lifted above our sinful community, being "made higher than the heavens," at the same time that He makes believers as such (not as sinners), "to sit together (with Him) in heavenly places" (Ep 2:6). Just as Moses on the mount was separated from and above the people, and alone with God. This proves Jesus is God. "Though innumerable lies have been forged against the venerable Jesus, none dared to charge Him with any intemperance" [Origen]. made-- Jesus was higher before (Joh 17:5), and as the God-MAN was made so by the Father after His humiliation (compare He 1:4). higher than the heavens-- for "He passed through [so the Greek] the heavens" (He 4:14).


<hi type="bold">27. daily--</hi>"day by day." The priests daily offered sacrifices (<reference osisRef="Heb.9.6">He 9:6</reference>; <reference osisRef="Heb.10.11">10:11</reference>; <reference osisRef="Exod.29.38-Exod.29.42">Ex 29:38-42</reference>). The high priests took part in these daily-offered sacrifices only on festival days; but as they represented the whole priesthood, the daily offerings are here attributed to them; their exclusive function was to offer the atonement "once every year" (<reference osisRef="Heb.9.7">He 9:7</reference>), and "year by year continually" (<reference osisRef="Heb.10.1">He 10:1</reference>). The "daily" strictly belongs to Christ, not to the high priests, "who needeth not daily, as those high priests (year by year, and their subordinate priests daily), to offer," &c.

<hi type="bold">offer up--</hi>The Greek term is peculiarly used of sacrifices for sin. The high priest's double offering on the day of atonement, the bullock for himself, and the goat for the people's sins, had its counterpart in the TWO lambs offered daily by the ordinary priests.

<hi type="bold">this he did--</hi>not "died first for His own sins and then the people's," but for the people's only. The negation is twofold: He needeth not to offer (1) daily; nor (2) to offer for His own sins also; for He offered Himself a spotless sacrifice (<reference osisRef="Heb.7.26">He 7:26</reference>; <reference osisRef="Heb.4.15">He 4:15</reference>). The sinless alone could offer for the sinful.

<hi type="bold">once--</hi>rather as Greek, "once for all." The sufficiency of the one sacrifice to atone for all sins for ever, resulted from its absolute spotlessness.

27. daily-- "day by day." The priests daily offered sacrifices (He 9:6; 10:11; Ex 29:38-42). The high priests took part in these daily-offered sacrifices only on festival days; but as they represented the whole priesthood, the daily offerings are here attributed to them; their exclusive function was to offer the atonement "once every year" (He 9:7), and "year by year continually" (He 10:1). The "daily" strictly belongs to Christ, not to the high priests, "who needeth not daily, as those high priests (year by year, and their subordinate priests daily), to offer," &c. offer up-- The Greek term is peculiarly used of sacrifices for sin. The high priest's double offering on the day of atonement, the bullock for himself, and the goat for the people's sins, had its counterpart in the TWO lambs offered daily by the ordinary priests. this he did-- not "died first for His own sins and then the people's," but for the people's only. The negation is twofold: He needeth not to offer (1) daily; nor (2) to offer for His own sins also; for He offered Himself a spotless sacrifice (He 7:26; He 4:15). The sinless alone could offer for the sinful. once-- rather as Greek, "once for all." The sufficiency of the one sacrifice to atone for all sins for ever, resulted from its absolute spotlessness.