Files
libre-bible-data/packages/json/net-engnet/notes-by-chapter/GEN.1.study-notes.jsonl
T
2026-07-12 11:47:15 -05:00

15 lines
11 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{"id":1,"verse_id":"GEN.1.1","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":1,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"2","reference":"1.1","text":"God . This frequently used Hebrew name for God ( אֱלֹהִים , elohim ) is a plural form. When it refers to the one true God, the singular verb is normally used, as here. The plural form indicates majesty; the name stresses Gods sovereignty and incomparability he is the “God of gods.”","source_note_position":2,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A1/2"}
{"id":2,"verse_id":"GEN.1.2","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":2,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"4","reference":"1.2","text":"Darkness . The Hebrew word simply means “darkness,” but in the Bible it has come to symbolize what opposes God, such as judgment ( Exod 10:21 ), death ( Ps 88:13 ), oppression ( Isa 9:1 ), the wicked ( 1 Sam 2:9 ) and in general, sin. In Isa 45:7 it parallels “evil.” It is a fitting cover for the primeval waste, but it prepares the reader for the fact that God is about to reveal himself through his works.","source_note_position":4,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A2/4"}
{"id":3,"verse_id":"GEN.1.2","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":2,"note_index":2,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"9","reference":"1.2","text":"The water . The text deliberately changes now from the term for the watery deep to the general word for water. The arena is now the life-giving water and not the chaotic abyss-like deep. The change may be merely stylistic, but it may also carry some significance. The deep carries with it the sense of the abyss, chaos, darkness in short, that which is not good for life.","source_note_position":9,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A2/9"}
{"id":4,"verse_id":"GEN.1.3","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":3,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"3","reference":"1.3","text":"Light . The Hebrew word simply means “light,” but it is used often in scripture to convey the ideas of salvation, joy, knowledge, righteousness, and life. In this context one cannot ignore those connotations, for it is the antithesis of the darkness. The first thing God does is correct the darkness; without the light there is only chaos.","source_note_position":3,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A3/3"}
{"id":5,"verse_id":"GEN.1.9","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":9,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"1","reference":"1.9","text":"Let the water…be gathered to one place . In the beginning the water covered the whole earth; now the water was to be restricted to an area to form the ocean. The picture is one of the dry land as an island with the sea surrounding it. Again the sovereignty of God is revealed. Whereas the pagans saw the sea as a force to be reckoned with, God controls the boundaries of the sea. And in the judgment at the flood he will blur the boundaries so that chaos returns.","source_note_position":1,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A9/1"}
{"id":6,"verse_id":"GEN.1.11","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":11,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"2","reference":"1.11","text":"After their kinds . The Hebrew word translated “kind” ( מִין , min ) indicates again that God was concerned with defining and dividing time, space, and species. The point is that creation was with order, as opposed to chaos. And what God created and distinguished with boundaries was not to be confused (see Lev 19:19 and Deut 22:9-11 ).","source_note_position":2,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A11/2"}
{"id":7,"verse_id":"GEN.1.14","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":14,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"1","reference":"1.14","text":"Let there be lights . Light itself was created before the light-bearers. The order would not seem strange to the ancient Hebrew mind that did not automatically link daylight with the sun (note that dawn and dusk appear to have light without the sun).","source_note_position":1,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A14/1"}
{"id":8,"verse_id":"GEN.1.16","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":16,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"1","reference":"1.16","text":"Two great lights . The text goes to great length to discuss the creation of these lights, suggesting that the subject was very important to the ancients. Since these “lights” were considered deities in the ancient world, the section serves as a strong polemic (see G. Hasel, “The Polemical Nature of the Genesis Cosmology,” EvQ 46 [1974]: 81-102). The Book of Genesis is affirming they are created entities, not deities. To underscore this the text does not even give them names. If used here, the usual names for the sun and moon [ Shemesh and Yarih , respectively] might have carried pagan connotations, so they are simply described as greater and lesser lights. Moreover, they serve in the capacity that God gives them, which would not be the normal function the pagans ascribed to them. They merely divide, govern, and give light in Gods creation.","source_note_position":1,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A16/1"}
{"id":9,"verse_id":"GEN.1.18","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":18,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"1","reference":"1.18","text":"In days one to three there is a naming by God; in days five and six there is a blessing by God. But on day four there is neither. It could be a mere stylistic variation. But it could also be a deliberate design to avoid naming “sun” and “moon” or promoting them beyond what they are, things that God made to serve in his creation.","source_note_position":1,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A18/1"}
{"id":10,"verse_id":"GEN.1.22","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":22,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"2","reference":"1.22","text":"The instruction God gives to creation is properly a fuller expression of the statement just made (“God blessed them”), that he enriched them with the ability to reproduce. It is not saying that these were rational creatures who heard and obeyed the word; rather, it stresses that fruitfulness in the animal world is a result of the divine decree and not of some pagan cultic ritual for fruitfulness. The repeated emphasis of “be fruitful multiply fill” adds to this abundance God has given to life. The meaning is underscored by the similar sounds: בָּרָךְ ( barakh ) with בָּרָא ( bara ), and פָּרָה ( parah ) with רָבָה ( ravah ).","source_note_position":2,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A22/2"}
{"id":11,"verse_id":"GEN.1.26","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":26,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"1","reference":"1.26","text":"The plural form of the verb has been the subject of much discussion through the years, and not surprisingly several suggestions have been put forward. Many Christian theologians interpret it as an early hint of plurality within the Godhead, but this view imposes later trinitarian concepts on the ancient text. Some have suggested the plural verb indicates majesty, but the plural of majesty is not used with verbs. C. Westermann ( Genesis , 1:145) argues for a plural of “deliberation” here, but his proposed examples of this use ( 2 Sam 24:14 ; Isa 6:8 ) do not actually support his theory. In 2 Sam 24:14 David uses the plural as representative of all Israel, and in Isa 6:8 the Lord speaks on behalf of his heavenly court. In its ancient Israelite context the plural is most naturally understood as referring to God and his heavenly court (see 1 Kgs 22:19-22 ; Job 1:6-12; 2:1-6 ; Isa 6:1-8 ). (The most well-known members of this court are Gods messengers, or angels. In Gen 3:5 the serpent may refer to this group as “gods/divine beings.” See the note on the word “evil” in 3:5 .) If this is the case, God invites the heavenly court to participate in the creation of humankind (perhaps in the role of offering praise, see Job 38:7 ), but he himself is the one who does the actual creative work (v. 27 ). Of course, this view does assume that the members of the heavenly court possess the divine “image” in some way. Since the image is closely associated with rulership, perhaps they share the divine image in that they, together with God and under his royal authority, are the executive authority over the world.","source_note_position":1,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A26/1"}
{"id":12,"verse_id":"GEN.1.27","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":27,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"3","reference":"1.27","text":"The distinction of “humankind” as “male” and “female” is another point of separation in Gods creation. There is no possibility that the verse is teaching that humans were first androgynous (having both male and female physical characteristics) and afterward were separated. The mention of male and female prepares for the blessing to follow.","source_note_position":3,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A27/3"}
{"id":13,"verse_id":"GEN.1.28","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":28,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"4","reference":"1.28","text":"The several imperatives addressed to both males and females together (plural imperative forms) actually form two commands: reproduce and rule. Gods word is not merely a form of blessing, but is now addressed to them personally; this is a distinct emphasis with the creation of human beings. But with the blessing comes the ability to be fruitful and to rule. In procreation they will share in the divine work of creating human life and passing on the divine image (see 5:1-3 ); in ruling they will serve as Gods vice-regents on earth. They together, the human race collectively, have the responsibility of seeing to the welfare of that which is put under them and the privilege of using it for their benefit.","source_note_position":4,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A28/4"}
{"id":14,"verse_id":"GEN.1.29","translation_id":"net-engnet","book_id":"GEN","chapter":1,"verse":29,"note_index":1,"note_type":"study_note","label":"NET study note","caller":"2","reference":"1.29","text":"G. J. Wenham ( Genesis [WBC], 1:34) points out that there is nothing in the passage that prohibits the man and the woman from eating meat. He suggests that eating meat came after the fall. Gen 9:3 may then ratify the postfall practice of eating meat rather than inaugurate the practice, as is often understood.","source_note_position":2,"source_url":"https://netbible.org/resource/netNote/Genesis%201%3A29/2"}